인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
Focused on Adorno’s early, unpublished essay titled “Theses on the Language of the Philosopher”, the present article is intended to reconstruct his primary conceptions of anguage on the basis of the material, historical, and dialectical character of his approach to language so as to provide a framework that offers the core terms of his perspective and critique of language. That short text written by Adorno in 1930s is important not only because problems that continue to occupy Adorno throughout his whole life can be identified in it, but also because the main elements of his critique of language are already present earlier on. Especially a question that becomes decisive for Adorno’s later work, that is, the ‘convergence of art and knowledge"is posed in Adorno’s “Theses” essay.
I try to demonstrate thematically that for Adorno the material, historical, and dialectical approach to language centering around the relation between thing and word is elaborated in the contrast Adorno draws between ‘significative"and ‘configurative"language. With this, it can be thematized in and through Adorno’s thought to seek for the alternative philosophical language. The thinking of Adorno, I suggest, may contain implicitly a kind of particular linguistic turn as well. To put it another way, we might say that there is an implicit language philosophy in Adorno, what Albrecht Wellmer nicely have called ‘buried treasure’.
I try to demonstrate thematically that for Adorno the material, historical, and dialectical approach to language centering around the relation between thing and word is elaborated in the contrast Adorno draws between ‘significative"and ‘configurative"language. With this, it can be thematized in and through Adorno’s thought to seek for the alternative philosophical language. The thinking of Adorno, I suggest, may contain implicitly a kind of particular linguistic turn as well. To put it another way, we might say that there is an implicit language philosophy in Adorno, what Albrecht Wellmer nicely have called ‘buried treasure’.
#아도르노
#칸트
#하이데거
#언어
#언어비판
#사물화
#동일성
#철학자의 언어에 대한 테제
#Adorno
#Kant
#Heidegger
#Language
#Critique of Language
#Verdinglichung
#Identity
#Theses on the Language of the Philosopher
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 들어가는 말
- 1. 언어의 유물론적 성격: 칸트의 관념론에 대한 언어비판
- 2. 언어의 역사적 성격: 하이데거의 존재론에 대한 언어비판
- 3. 언어의 변증법적 성격: 아도르노의 ‘형상적인 언어’
- 4. 와해된 언어의 구제 가능성?
- 5. 나가는 말
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
