지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Focused on Adorno’s early, unpublished essay titled “Theses on the Language of the Philosopher”, the present article is intended to reconstruct his primary conceptions of anguage on the basis of the material, historical, and dialectical character of his approach to language so as to provide a framework that offers the core terms of his perspective and critique of language. That short text written by Adorno in 1930s is important not only because problems that continue to occupy Adorno throughout his whole life can be identified in it, but also because the main elements of his critique of language are already present earlier on. Especially a question that becomes decisive for Adorno’s later work, that is, the ‘convergence of art and knowledge"is posed in Adorno’s “Theses” essay.
I try to demonstrate thematically that for Adorno the material, historical, and dialectical approach to language centering around the relation between thing and word is elaborated in the contrast Adorno draws between ‘significative"and ‘configurative"language. With this, it can be thematized in and through Adorno’s thought to seek for the alternative philosophical language. The thinking of Adorno, I suggest, may contain implicitly a kind of particular linguistic turn as well. To put it another way, we might say that there is an implicit language philosophy in Adorno, what Albrecht Wellmer nicely have called ‘buried treasure’.
I try to demonstrate thematically that for Adorno the material, historical, and dialectical approach to language centering around the relation between thing and word is elaborated in the contrast Adorno draws between ‘significative"and ‘configurative"language. With this, it can be thematized in and through Adorno’s thought to seek for the alternative philosophical language. The thinking of Adorno, I suggest, may contain implicitly a kind of particular linguistic turn as well. To put it another way, we might say that there is an implicit language philosophy in Adorno, what Albrecht Wellmer nicely have called ‘buried treasure’.
목차
1. 들어가는 말
1. 언어의 유물론적 성격: 칸트의 관념론에 대한 언어비판
2. 언어의 역사적 성격: 하이데거의 존재론에 대한 언어비판
3. 언어의 변증법적 성격: 아도르노의 ‘형상적인 언어’
4. 와해된 언어의 구제 가능성?
5. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0