지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.7
- 수록면
- 20 - 26 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) has become a viable alternative treatment for patients suffering with early gastric cancer. Surgeons have long thought that obesity might increase the rate of intraoperative or postoperative complications. This study was performed to evaluate the impact of obesity, according to the learning curve, in patients who underwent laparoscopy assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients who had undergone LADG for gastric cancer between September 2004 and May 2007 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center. We measured the degree of obesity by using the body mass index (BMI: ㎏/㎡), and we compared the surgical outcomes between the low BMI group (BMI ＜25 ㎏/㎡, n=72) and the high BMI group (BMI ＞25 ㎏/㎡, n=28). We further subdivided the patients into the surgeons’ number of cumulative LADG cases, the early learning curve group (from the first patient to the 50th patient) and the late learning curve group (from the 51th patient to the 100th patient). We analyzed them in terms of the operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, the rate of operative morbidity and the length of the postoperative hospital stay.
Results: There no significant differences between the high and low BMI groups in terms of the patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes, but there was a statistically significant difference in the operation times between the high BMI (303.3 min) and low BMI groups (269.3 min, P=0.029). The postoperative morbidity was not different between the high BMI (25%) and low BMI groups (12.5%, P=0.12). However, when we subdivided the patients by the learning curve, there was a statistically significant difference for the operation time (360 vs 297 minutes, respectively), postoperative morbidity (41.7 vs 10.5%, respectively) and the postoperative hospital stay (15.5 vs 8.6 day, respectively) between the high BMI and low BMI groups at the early learning curve period. Especially for male patients, the early learning curve period showed significant differences in the operation time, the postoperative morbidity and the postoperative hospital stay between the high BMI and low BMI groups, but in case of the female patients, there was no difference in postoperative morbidity and the length of the postoperative hospital stay. At the late learning curve period, there was no difference according to gender and obesity.
Conclusion: Obesity itself does not increase operative morbidity when performing LADG in patients with gastric cancer. However, at a surgeon’s initial period of performing LADG, a careful approach seems to be required for male obese patients.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 100 patients who had undergone LADG for gastric cancer between September 2004 and May 2007 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center. We measured the degree of obesity by using the body mass index (BMI: ㎏/㎡), and we compared the surgical outcomes between the low BMI group (BMI ＜25 ㎏/㎡, n=72) and the high BMI group (BMI ＞25 ㎏/㎡, n=28). We further subdivided the patients into the surgeons’ number of cumulative LADG cases, the early learning curve group (from the first patient to the 50th patient) and the late learning curve group (from the 51th patient to the 100th patient). We analyzed them in terms of the operation time, the amount of intraoperative bleeding, the number of retrieved lymph nodes, the rate of operative morbidity and the length of the postoperative hospital stay.
Results: There no significant differences between the high and low BMI groups in terms of the patients’ clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes, but there was a statistically significant difference in the operation times between the high BMI (303.3 min) and low BMI groups (269.3 min, P=0.029). The postoperative morbidity was not different between the high BMI (25%) and low BMI groups (12.5%, P=0.12). However, when we subdivided the patients by the learning curve, there was a statistically significant difference for the operation time (360 vs 297 minutes, respectively), postoperative morbidity (41.7 vs 10.5%, respectively) and the postoperative hospital stay (15.5 vs 8.6 day, respectively) between the high BMI and low BMI groups at the early learning curve period. Especially for male patients, the early learning curve period showed significant differences in the operation time, the postoperative morbidity and the postoperative hospital stay between the high BMI and low BMI groups, but in case of the female patients, there was no difference in postoperative morbidity and the length of the postoperative hospital stay. At the late learning curve period, there was no difference according to gender and obesity.
Conclusion: Obesity itself does not increase operative morbidity when performing LADG in patients with gastric cancer. However, at a surgeon’s initial period of performing LADG, a careful approach seems to be required for male obese patients.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
조기 위암에서 수술시간을 고려한 복강경 보조하 위아전절제술의 학습곡선
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .02
-
복강경 보조 원위부 위절제술의 초기 경험
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .12
-
비만도가 조기위암 환자의 복강경 보조하 위아전절제술에 미치는 영향
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2005 .07
-
조기위암 치료에 대한 복강경보조 위절제술과 개복 위절제술에 있어서 비만도의 영향
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .08
-
Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of Surgical Outcomes of and Learning Curves for Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy
Journal of Gastric Cancer
2015 .01
-
조기위암에 시행된 복강경 보조 원위부 위절제술의 학습곡선 극복 시점 및 극복 전후의 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .05
-
위암환자의 수술 후 합병증 발생에 영향을 미치는 인자
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2004 .11
-
Surgical Effect on Postoperative Weight Change in Patients with Gastrectomy for early gastric cancer
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
복강경 보조 위 아전절제술 : 연속된 202예의 경험
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2006 .12
-
조기위암의 복강경 보조 원위부 위절제술과 개복술의 비교 : 학습곡선을 극복한 그룹에서
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2005 .03
-
조기 위암의 복강경 보조 위절제술과 개복 위절제술의 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2007 .03
-
위암 환자에 있어 수술 후 추적검사
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2003 .11
-
A single institution experience of laparoscopic gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer : analysis of postoperative morbidities and long-term oncologic outcomes
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2017 .11
-
위암 환자의 술후 합병증에 영향을 미치는 인자
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1997 .09
-
Postoperative Organ Failure and In-hospital Mortality after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
대한임상종양학회 학술대회지
2015 .02
-
위암 환자의 복강경 보조하 위절제술 117예에 대한 분석
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2004 .08
-
Influencing factors on postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2016 .02
-
Prognostic impact of postoperative complication after gastrectomy for patient with gastric cancer in real world data
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2019 .10
-
환자의 비만도가 복강경 보조 위원위부절제술의 수술성적과 수술 후 경과에 미치는 영향
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .02
-
Impact of chronologic age in the elderly with gastric cancer
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2012 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002691107