지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2009.12
- 수록면
- 399 - 403 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has traditionally been accompanied by T-tube drainage. However, patients must carry it for several weeks and often suffer problems related to the T-tube. So, primary closure of CBD has been proposed as a safe and effective alternative to T-tube placement after laparoscopic choledochotomy. The aim of this study was to compare primary closure versus T-tube drainage after LCBDE.
Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2005, 63 patients suffering from choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE successfully through choledochotomy. Those patients were devided into two groups; primary closure group (group P) and T-tube placement group (group T). Patients’ clinical characeristics, postoperative outcome and follow up data were compared between the two groups.
Results: Of 63 patients, 30 (48.6%) had primary closure of the choledochotomy and 33 (52.4%) had T-tube drainage. Stone clearance rate was 100% in both groups. The mean operation time and the incidence of postoperative complications had no significant difference between the two groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay (8.8 vs. 16.4 days, P＜0.001) was significantly shorter in the P group compared to the T group. Each group had one recurrent CBD stone. None of both groups showed symptoms or signs associated with CBD stricture during the follow up period.
Conclusion: Primary closure of choledochotomy after LCBDE can prevent the disadvantages associated with T-tube and lead to a shorter hospital stay. Therefore, primary closure should be considered as a safe alternative method after LCBDE.
Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2005, 63 patients suffering from choledocholithiasis underwent LCBDE successfully through choledochotomy. Those patients were devided into two groups; primary closure group (group P) and T-tube placement group (group T). Patients’ clinical characeristics, postoperative outcome and follow up data were compared between the two groups.
Results: Of 63 patients, 30 (48.6%) had primary closure of the choledochotomy and 33 (52.4%) had T-tube drainage. Stone clearance rate was 100% in both groups. The mean operation time and the incidence of postoperative complications had no significant difference between the two groups. The mean postoperative hospital stay (8.8 vs. 16.4 days, P＜0.001) was significantly shorter in the P group compared to the T group. Each group had one recurrent CBD stone. None of both groups showed symptoms or signs associated with CBD stricture during the follow up period.
Conclusion: Primary closure of choledochotomy after LCBDE can prevent the disadvantages associated with T-tube and lead to a shorter hospital stay. Therefore, primary closure should be considered as a safe alternative method after LCBDE.
목차
서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
내시경적 치료에 실패한 총담관석 환자에서의 복강경 총담관 탐색술
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2009 .09
-
복강경 총담관 탐색술의 임상적 고찰
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2011 .03
-
담도 결석 환자에서 개복 담관 탐색술과 복강경 담관 탐색술의 장기 추적 관찰 결과의 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2010 .07
-
Long-term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by choledochotomy for choledocholithiasis : 15-year experience from a single center
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2014 .01
-
Ten-year experience on common bile duct exploration without T-tube insertion
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2013 .05
-
내시경적 치료로 제거하지 못한 총담관 결석에서의 복강경 담관 탐색술 성적
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2008 .09
-
총수담관 탐색술 후 총수담관 일차봉합과 T자관 배액의 임상적 비교
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2003 .06
-
담도절개후 단순원천 봉합에 대한 임상적 고찰
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1993 .12
-
복강경 담관 절개술
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1993 .07
-
총담관결석의 내시경 치료
대한내과학회지
2015 .01
-
Identification of risk factors for stone recurrence after laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration of CBD stones
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2016 .04
-
Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for elderly patients : as a first treatment strategy for common bile duct stones
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2011 .08
-
Primary closure after LCBD exploration combined with flexible choledochoscopy : mid to long term follow up results
한국간담췌외과학회 학술대회지
2013 .04
-
총담관결석에 동반된 총담관 막양구조
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2007 .05
-
담도절개후 T-관 삽관 배액과 단순원천봉합의 전향적 비교 연구
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1994 .01
-
담도절개 후 단순일차봉합과 T-관 삽입배액술의 비교
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2003 .07
-
복강경 총담관 결석 제거술의 임상적 고찰
대한외과학회 학술대회 초록집
2009 .11
-
총수담관결석 환자에서 복강경 수술과 개복술의 비교 연구
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
2002 .11
-
Comparison of Bile Drainage Methods after Laparoscopic CBD Exploration
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
2011 .06
-
담낭 및 총담관 담석증 환자의 담석 종류에 따른 담즙 성분에 대한 비교분석
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research
1997 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-514-002680415