지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
During the early half of the Joseon dynasty period, all properties of the parents were equally distributed to the children, in a fashion referred to as “Gyun‘bun( ).” Yet some of such properties 均分were not easy to be distributed in an ‘equal fashion,’ as it was impossible to split the parents’ house itself. So maintaining the ‘Gyun’bun’ principle was sometimes difficult. Then, in what fashion the children would have inherited that portion of the parents’ property?
There was in fact an exception to the ‘Gyun’bun’ principle, even during the early half of the Joseon dynasty period, and that was ‘the property’ which were reserved to be used or accessed for occasions of holding memorial services for the ancestors. Such properties were designated in the “Bongsa-jo(奉祀條)” category of the law. In 1427(9th year of king Sejong’s reign), all residences equipped with a ‘Family Shrine(Ga’myo, 家廟)’ were instructed by law to be inherited to the descendant designated to be in charge of the ancestral services(“Ju’je Ja’son, 主祭子孫”). Then what would have been the case of all the “Ib-myo Residences?” Would have they belonged to the Bongsa-jo category as well, and deemed as an exception from the ‘Gyun’bun’ principle? What would have been the relationship with the Ib-myo residences, and the general definition of a “Bongsa-jo property?”
In this article, with the questions raised above kept in mind, the Sajok figures’ inheritance practices of living residences are examined through the ‘Records of Dividing Properties’ of the 15th and 16th centuries. First, their ownerships of residences are examined, and then their inheritances of them.
There was in fact an exception to the ‘Gyun’bun’ principle, even during the early half of the Joseon dynasty period, and that was ‘the property’ which were reserved to be used or accessed for occasions of holding memorial services for the ancestors. Such properties were designated in the “Bongsa-jo(奉祀條)” category of the law. In 1427(9th year of king Sejong’s reign), all residences equipped with a ‘Family Shrine(Ga’myo, 家廟)’ were instructed by law to be inherited to the descendant designated to be in charge of the ancestral services(“Ju’je Ja’son, 主祭子孫”). Then what would have been the case of all the “Ib-myo Residences?” Would have they belonged to the Bongsa-jo category as well, and deemed as an exception from the ‘Gyun’bun’ principle? What would have been the relationship with the Ib-myo residences, and the general definition of a “Bongsa-jo property?”
In this article, with the questions raised above kept in mind, the Sajok figures’ inheritance practices of living residences are examined through the ‘Records of Dividing Properties’ of the 15th and 16th centuries. First, their ownerships of residences are examined, and then their inheritances of them.
목차
머리말
1. 사족층의 주택 소유와 거주 양상
2. 주택 상속의 특징
맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (10)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - 문숙자 / 2004 / 조선시대 재산 상속과 가족 / 경인문화사
2. [학위논문] - 鄭肯植 / 1996 / 朝鮮初期 祭祀承繼法制의 成立에 관한 硏究 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
3. [단행본] - 鄭寅國 / 1974 / 韓國建築樣式論 / 일지사
4. [학위논문] - 崔 壹 / 1989 / 朝鮮 中期以後 南部地方 中上流住居에 관한 硏究: 階層性과 地域性의 觀点에서 본 配置와 平面構成을 中心으로 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박현순 / 1999 / 16세기 士大夫家의 親族秩序 / 韓國史硏究 107
2. [학위논문] - 鄭肯植 / 1996 / 朝鮮初期 祭祀承繼法制의 成立에 관한 硏究 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
3. [단행본] - 鄭寅國 / 1974 / 韓國建築樣式論 / 일지사
4. [학위논문] - 崔 壹 / 1989 / 朝鮮 中期以後 南部地方 中上流住居에 관한 硏究: 階層性과 地域性의 觀点에서 본 配置와 平面構成을 中心으로 / 박사 / 서울大學校 大學院
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 박현순 / 1999 / 16세기 士大夫家의 親族秩序 / 韓國史硏究 107
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
조선전기 재산상속법제에서 여성의 지위
김은아
법학연구
2007
.11
조선 중기 예학사상의 사회적 수용과 일상문화의 변화 : 『주자가례』를 중심으로
편집부
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2006
.06
조선 후기 향리층의 혼인 네트워크 : 『경상도단성현호적대장』을 중심으로
권기중
한국사학보
2008
.11
청주 원도심 내 현존하는 옛마을의 공간구성 변화 : 탑동 `양달말`을 대상으로
권미선
,
김태영
한국주거학회 학술대회논문집
2010
.11
도심 내 현존하는 옛마을에 있어서 신축주택의 배치양상 : 청주 탑동 '양달말'을 대상으로
채수민
,
변경화
,
김태영
한국주거학회논문집
2011
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0