지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Planning theories have been criticized for a lack of relevance to practice. Previous studies argued that for the relevance, planners adopt a group of theories instead of attempting to identify one best theory. Planners were not considered in the studies, however, although they actually use the theories and assess the relevance in practice. Thus, this study explores how the practical relevance differs according to characteristics planners have. For empirical analysis, individual theories of planning are categorized into groups, each of which proposes a certain planner role. Then, this study investigates which role is adopted in practice, that is, which theory is practically relevant. Logit models find that planners’ sociodemographics, work settings, and specialties are associated with the relevance of the theories. Chi-squared test of association and tetrachoric correlation confirm that for the relevance, planners choose either the group of rational-refined rational-transactive/communicative planning or that of radical-advocacy planning.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 계획이론 실무적합성에 대한 선행연구
Ⅲ. 계획이론 분류: 의사결정의 과정 및 권한
Ⅳ. 실증분석
Ⅴ. 요약 및 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (63)
참고문헌 신청
4. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Aitken, S. C / 1995 / Who contrives the “ real” in GIS? / Cartography and Geographic Information Science 22 (1) : 17 ~ 29
5. [단행본] - Alexander, E. R / 1996 / After rationality, In Explorations in Planning Theory / Explorations in Planning Theory : 45 ~ 64
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Alexander, E. R / 2003 / Response to ‘Why do planning theory? / Planning Theory 2 (3) : 179 ~ 182
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Alexander, E. R / 2005 / What do planners need to know? Identifying needed competencies, methods, and skills / Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22 (2) : 91 ~ 106
8. [단행본] - Baum, H. S / 1983 / Planners and Public Expectations / Schenkman
5. [단행본] - Alexander, E. R / 1996 / After rationality, In Explorations in Planning Theory / Explorations in Planning Theory : 45 ~ 64
6. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Alexander, E. R / 2003 / Response to ‘Why do planning theory? / Planning Theory 2 (3) : 179 ~ 182
7. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Alexander, E. R / 2005 / What do planners need to know? Identifying needed competencies, methods, and skills / Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 22 (2) : 91 ~ 106
8. [단행본] - Baum, H. S / 1983 / Planners and Public Expectations / Schenkman
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-359-002670134