지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.6
- 수록면
- 201 - 225 (25page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Even though Loncraine’s Richard Ⅲ (1995) and Al Pacino’s Looking for Richard (1996) attempt filming Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ they seem completely different works to the modern audience. It’s not only the matter of filming techniques, but that of the representative meanings the directors focus on. The purpose of this paper is to make a comparison analysis of the different political perspectives of Loncraine’s Richard Ⅲ and Alpacino’s Looking for Richard. While Shakespeare’s Richard is a very complicated character, Loncraine’s Richard and Alpacino’s Richard are portrayed rather simple and obvious characters. Shakespeare’s Richard is not a historical king but rather a role-player of villain escaping from history. Loncraine’s Richard and Alpacino’s Richard are the role-players of villain escaping from Shakespearean play.
While Loncraine produced a modern film adapting a completely new historical background, Alpacino attempted a documentary film focusing on producing process of Shakespearean drama. If Alpacino plays the role of a kind guide for people who want to know and study Shakespeare, Loncraine and McKellen put new clothes on Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ. Loncraine draws out a modern dictator through the character of Richard III evoking Hitler and Mussolini, and presents a satirical message toward dictatorship. Meanwhile Alpacino arouses an effect of epic theater by keeping the audience from being immersed in the film, which make it possible for the audience to enjoy Alpacino’s role-playing and making a film.
Furthermore, these two films subtly reveal quite contrasting national feelings of Shakespearean dramas. Loncraine’s Richard Ⅲ, which was made in England, seems to reveal some uncomfortable feelings against America and American film industry. On the contrary, Alpacino’s Looking for Richard well represents the Americans’ dual feelings about Shakespeare. Most Americans don’t have interests in Shakespeare and find it difficult and boring, but they also have some kind of inferiority to English royal tradition. Alpacino seems to attempt overcoming this inferiority and to present his excellence, an American’s excellence.
While Loncraine produced a modern film adapting a completely new historical background, Alpacino attempted a documentary film focusing on producing process of Shakespearean drama. If Alpacino plays the role of a kind guide for people who want to know and study Shakespeare, Loncraine and McKellen put new clothes on Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ. Loncraine draws out a modern dictator through the character of Richard III evoking Hitler and Mussolini, and presents a satirical message toward dictatorship. Meanwhile Alpacino arouses an effect of epic theater by keeping the audience from being immersed in the film, which make it possible for the audience to enjoy Alpacino’s role-playing and making a film.
Furthermore, these two films subtly reveal quite contrasting national feelings of Shakespearean dramas. Loncraine’s Richard Ⅲ, which was made in England, seems to reveal some uncomfortable feelings against America and American film industry. On the contrary, Alpacino’s Looking for Richard well represents the Americans’ dual feelings about Shakespeare. Most Americans don’t have interests in Shakespeare and find it difficult and boring, but they also have some kind of inferiority to English royal tradition. Alpacino seems to attempt overcoming this inferiority and to present his excellence, an American’s excellence.
목차
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (14)
참고문헌 신청
1. [학술지(정기간행물)] - 신웅재 / 2011 / 셰익스피어의 현대화: 리처드 론크레인의 『리처드 3세』 / Shakespeare Review 47 (1) : 47 ~ 66
2. [단행본] - Besnault, Marie-Helene / 2002 / Historical Legacy and fiction: the poetical reinvention of King Richard III, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays / Cambridge UP : 106 ~ 125
3. [단행본] - Buhler,Stephen M / 2002 / Shakespeare in the Cinema:Ocular Proof / State U of New York P
4. [단행본] - Coursen, H. R / 2000 / Three Films of Richard III, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film / Cambridge UP : 99 ~ 116
5. [단행본] - Garber, Marjorie. B / 1987 / Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality / Methuen
2. [단행본] - Besnault, Marie-Helene / 2002 / Historical Legacy and fiction: the poetical reinvention of King Richard III, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare’s History Plays / Cambridge UP : 106 ~ 125
3. [단행본] - Buhler,Stephen M / 2002 / Shakespeare in the Cinema:Ocular Proof / State U of New York P
4. [단행본] - Coursen, H. R / 2000 / Three Films of Richard III, In The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare on Film / Cambridge UP : 99 ~ 116
5. [단행본] - Garber, Marjorie. B / 1987 / Shakespeare’s Ghost Writers: Literature as Uncanny Causality / Methuen
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
셰익스피어의 현대화 : 리처드 론크레인의 『리처드 3세』
신웅재
Shakespeare Review
2011
.03
『리처드 3세』(Richard III)에 나타난 악의 비전 : 반복과 고착, 무와 무능
김문규
Shakespeare Review
2015
.12
이언 맥컬린의 〈리처드 3세〉: 성적 능력의 환타지의 실패
김용태
Shakespeare Review
2010
.06
『리처드 3세』의 극적 구조
박우수
외국문학연구
2008
.08
최근 셰익스피어 영화의 흐름 : 2000년대 <맥베스>를 중심으로
강석주
Shakespeare Review
2013
.09
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-003632605