지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.6
- 수록면
- 387 - 410 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This essay is a comparative analysis of the two heroes of King Lear and The Tempest on the basis of Chuang Tzu’s ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life.’ Of the precious lessons of ‘The Essence of Inspiring Life,’ in particular, the main theme of a life in accordance with nature is chosen as a method to analyze both the heroes. This essay focuses upon the two heroes’ attitudes toward nature in order to induce an answer to the question, “Why do they have different endings?”
In the first place, Lear is argued as a hero against nature though he seems. betrayed by his two unnatural daughters. The reason is that he dares to divide his kingship which has no meaning when it is broken into two as an egg and deserts his own daughter Cordelia for his own good. This essay claims that these two decisions are improper because they are against nature.
On the other hand, this essay estimates Prospero as a hero in accordance with nature even though he uses a magic to recover his lost dukeship. To support this argument, the fact that he ultimately chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and gives up his magic staff and book is mentioned. In addition, his final attitude toward Caliban who plots to take his life functions as an essential point to prove his life conforming to nature because he accepts Caliban’ s dark side as a part of his.
In conclusion, this essay argues that the two plays deal with a life conforming to nature in the spite of the fact that they have different endings and Lear and Prospero can be analogized by a different perspective with the help of Chuang Tzu’s thought.
In the first place, Lear is argued as a hero against nature though he seems. betrayed by his two unnatural daughters. The reason is that he dares to divide his kingship which has no meaning when it is broken into two as an egg and deserts his own daughter Cordelia for his own good. This essay claims that these two decisions are improper because they are against nature.
On the other hand, this essay estimates Prospero as a hero in accordance with nature even though he uses a magic to recover his lost dukeship. To support this argument, the fact that he ultimately chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and gives up his magic staff and book is mentioned. In addition, his final attitude toward Caliban who plots to take his life functions as an essential point to prove his life conforming to nature because he accepts Caliban’ s dark side as a part of his.
In conclusion, this essay argues that the two plays deal with a life conforming to nature in the spite of the fact that they have different endings and Lear and Prospero can be analogized by a different perspective with the help of Chuang Tzu’s thought.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 리어 왕과 「양생주」
Ⅲ. 프로스페로의 양생의 도
Ⅳ. 결론
인용문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-840-003632670