지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.1
- 수록면
- 31 - 37 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Objective : This research compared stabilities between two types of dental implant (SLATM, Institut Straumann AG, Waldenburg, Switzerland and SSⅡTM, Osstem co, Busan, Korea) using Osstell Mentor (Integration Diagnostics AB, Goteborg, Sweden) considering surgery methods, surgery area, diameter of implant, systemic disease, and smoking for obtaining prognosis information when installing fixture of dental implant.
Materials & Methods : 206 implants of 131 patients taken by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were determined as a final sample. Dental implants were installed as protocol of supplier by a excellent dentist who had 10 years experience about dental implants. Before connecting abutments (3 months after installation of fixture), RFA were measured twice for buccal and lingual direction to obtain average value.
Results : Dental implants at mandible showed significantly higher stabilities significantly than at maxilla (p<0.001). Diameter 4.8 implants had also higher stabilities than diameter 4.1 in case of SLATM implants (p<0.001). SLATM implants showed more excellent stabilities than SSⅡTM implants, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032).
Conclusions : This research revealed higher stabilities of SLATM implants than SSⅡTM implant, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032).
Materials & Methods : 206 implants of 131 patients taken by resonance frequency analysis (RFA) were determined as a final sample. Dental implants were installed as protocol of supplier by a excellent dentist who had 10 years experience about dental implants. Before connecting abutments (3 months after installation of fixture), RFA were measured twice for buccal and lingual direction to obtain average value.
Results : Dental implants at mandible showed significantly higher stabilities significantly than at maxilla (p<0.001). Diameter 4.8 implants had also higher stabilities than diameter 4.1 in case of SLATM implants (p<0.001). SLATM implants showed more excellent stabilities than SSⅡTM implants, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032).
Conclusions : This research revealed higher stabilities of SLATM implants than SSⅡTM implant, especially at posterior area of mandible (p=0.045) and premolar area of maxilla (p=0.032).
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 재료 및 방법
Ⅲ. 결과
Ⅳ. 고찰
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (32)
참고문헌 신청
Zix J / 2008 / Measurement of Dental Implant Stability by Resonance frequency analysis and damping capacity assessment : Comparison of both techniques in a clinical trial / Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 23(3):525~530
Sennerby L / 2008 / Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis : biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications / Periodonto 2000 47:51~66
Meredith N / 1998 / Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant / Int J Prosthodont 11(5):491~501
Rodrigo D / 2010 / Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival : a prosective case series study / Clin Oral Implants Res 21(3):255~261
Friberg B / 1999 / Stabiluty Measurements of noe-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(4):266~272
Sennerby L / 2008 / Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis : biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications / Periodonto 2000 47:51~66
Meredith N / 1998 / Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant / Int J Prosthodont 11(5):491~501
Rodrigo D / 2010 / Diagnosis of implant stability and its impact on implant survival : a prosective case series study / Clin Oral Implants Res 21(3):255~261
Friberg B / 1999 / Stabiluty Measurements of noe-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency analysis study / J Oral Maxillofac Surg 28(4):266~272
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-515-003505869