지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this research is to solve two questions on the naming of the hero of The Tale of Genji. One question is the reason why the description of the naming is positioned at the end of Chapter Kiritsubo, unrelated to the preceding part, in which the hero’s housing affairs are mentioned. And the other is the meaning of the description that the person who named the hero “Hikaru kimi” was a visitor from the Korean Peninsula. As for the first question, we reached a conclusion that the description of the naming comes last because Chapter Kiritsubo is constructed according to the biography of Prince Shotoku in Nihon-shoki, the first chronicle in Japan. The short biography has 6 constituents: the hero’s parents, birth, talent, father’s love, housing and name. Chapter Kiritsubo has just the same 6 constituents listed above in the same order. In other words, Hikaru Genji, the hero of The Tale of Genji, is prototypically modeled after Prince Shotoku.And one reason why a Korean should be the hero’s godfather is that the Korean Peninsula was considered to be a culturally advanced area in those times. The author needed a common criterion in the cultural area of East Asia to estimate the hero objectively. Another reason we can indicate for the second question is that only men from the Korean Peninsula could see the radiation of Bodhisattva in Prince Shotoku. The author of The Tale of Genji might have expected the readers to imagine that the Korean visitor actually saw the radiation of Bodhisattva in the hero, which brought him the idea of the name “Hikaru-kimi”.
목차
序論
第1章「光る君」命名記事の謎
第2章 桐壺?の構成と『日本書紀』太子?
第3章 光源氏のモデル
第4章 光を見る?訪者
結論
?考文?
논문초록
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-913-003480098