인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
It is a controversial issue to decide to what extent does the management have access to personal information of workers, as the management provides medical check-up and epidemiology research. The labor is opposed to provide workers’ personal information claiming that the information accessed could affect the employment process while the business owners believe that they need personal information to prevent accidents, which is directly linked to protect workers’ health.
It is a time to clarify the limit of accessing to the personal information when the labor is asking unambiguous process of epidemiology research and opening of its result even though it refuses to open the information. In that sense we need to identify what they are claiming from each side to forge a clear relationship between people’s right to know and obligation to provide personal information, which needs to be reflected on the amendment process of OSH act.
As of now legal background of workers’ health check-up is written on the Article 43 of OSH Act which follows the Korean Labor Standards Act. The Korean Labor Standards Act finally follows the Constitution to protect health of workers, which as a result gives a legal permission to conduct a special medical check-up of workers. Meanwhile, protection of personal information has a legitimacy based on the right to control one’s own information and right to decide one’s own information, derived from the Article 17 of the Constitution, which says one’s right towards freedom and private life not to be violated. These two grounds require us to review and clarify the legal back ground of special medical check-up of workers.
It is a time to clarify the limit of accessing to the personal information when the labor is asking unambiguous process of epidemiology research and opening of its result even though it refuses to open the information. In that sense we need to identify what they are claiming from each side to forge a clear relationship between people’s right to know and obligation to provide personal information, which needs to be reflected on the amendment process of OSH act.
As of now legal background of workers’ health check-up is written on the Article 43 of OSH Act which follows the Korean Labor Standards Act. The Korean Labor Standards Act finally follows the Constitution to protect health of workers, which as a result gives a legal permission to conduct a special medical check-up of workers. Meanwhile, protection of personal information has a legitimacy based on the right to control one’s own information and right to decide one’s own information, derived from the Article 17 of the Constitution, which says one’s right towards freedom and private life not to be violated. These two grounds require us to review and clarify the legal back ground of special medical check-up of workers.
#정보보호
#정보보안
#산업안전보건법
#헌법
#개인정보자기결정권
#특수건강검진
#근로기준법
#근로자의 건강보호
#영업비밀
#의무충돌
#부작위범
#민감정보
#정보비밀 유지청구권
#personal information
#OSH Act
#Constitution
#Korean Labor Standards Act
#special medical check-up
#information and right to decide one’s own information
#protect workers’ health
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 서론
- Ⅱ. 개인정보의 개념 및 법률적 근거
- Ⅲ. 국·내외 건강정보 보호제도
- Ⅳ. 개인정보관련 판례동향
- Ⅴ. 개인정보보호와 사업주 책임
- Ⅵ. 개인정보보호를 위한 구체절차
- Ⅶ. 결론
- 참고문헌
- 〈Abstract〉
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2013-336-003229398
