지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From a theological perspective, Darwin’s theory of evolution is the doctrine of the idols which opposes to Christianity most heavily. Darwin’s evolutionism is only a theory explained in the way of inductive reasoning from his records of observation. But he skewed at the data, and his theory is very subjective. He built his hypothesis based on the limited observation records and ignored the contrary evidences. In other words, he tries to explain several phenomena in one theory. He applies the theory of evolution to any case. That is, the evolutionism is an omni-potent theory which can explain every mutation occurring at random in the nature without purpose or direction. Evolutionary theory can not be called empiricist science which has a strict system and rules. The vitality of Darwin’s theory of evolution has been maintained by his friends’ enthusiastic supports to defend him, theologians’ ignorance and deliberate aversion, the oppression to its critics in the scientific community and social changes. Darwin’s theory of evolution has been changed by too many “mutations” and “natural selection.” The original theory is completely gone away now, and there remains only the fossilized theory. Of course, from the standpoint of modern theology, what we need to resist is modern evolutionism. However, if one does not know the historical “original type”, he or she never know the identity of the modern evolutionism as “varieties”, which has undergone “natural selection” and “mutation.” Therefore, this paper is my first attempt to verify and then analyze the “original type” of the evolution theory.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ.〈종의 기원〉
Ⅲ.〈종의 기원〉에 의해 촉발된 과학과 신학의 논쟁
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0