메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강성화 (울산대학교) 박관태 (울산대학교) 김영훈 (울산대학교) 서혜련 (울산대학교) 한덕종 (울산대학교) 김송철 (울산대학교)
저널정보
한국간담췌외과학회 Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 한국간담췌외과학회지 제12권 제4호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
276 - 283 (8page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of spleen preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (SPLDP) with en bloc laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP).
Methods: From March 2005 to August 2008, 52 cases of SPLDP and 84 LDPs were performed at our institution and we retrospectively compared these cases. The enrollment period were chronologically divided to four eras of 10.5 months each.
Results: The demographics, including the patients’ age, gender and BMI, were not different between the two groups. The final pathologic diagnosis was diverse, and it included cystic tumor, SPT, IPMT, cancer, endocrine tumor, etc and there was no difference between the two groups. The tumor location, operative time, tumor size, perioperative transfusion requirement, the length of the hospital stay and the postoperative complications were not different between the two groups. The mean operative time was gradually shortened by eras (Era 1: 236.3 min, Era 2: 223.6 min, Era 3: 188.8 min, Era 4: 187.9 min) and the proportion of SPLDP was increased by eras from 1.9% to 9.6%, 42.3% and 46.2%, respectively.
Conclusion: SPLDP might be technically more difficult than LDP, and especially in the initial learning stage of performing laparoscopic pancreatic surgery. After overcoming the learning curve, SPLDP can be performed safely and possibly within a shorter time. SPLDP should be tried whenever possible so that the patients get the maximal benefits of minimal invasive surgery and especially for resecting the more distal pancreatic lesions.

목차

서론
대상 및 방법
결과
고찰
결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (29)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-514-001253970