지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.10
- 수록면
- 279 - 289 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In contemporary society, the importance of communities is becoming more crucial, and the youth centers, which play fundamental role in youth development, are significant in that they contribute to enhancing local communities. In Korea, with the enactment of the Youth Act, youth facilities were built by local governments as youth issues became important both socially and politically. The role of youth centers has recently become more important as five-day school week was implemented leaving youth with more spare time.
With the recognition of the importance of youth centers, this paper examined the distribution of youth centers in Korea and particularly in Seoul. Due to institutional regulations, the distribution of youth training centers is fixed to one youth center to one district in general. What is means is that it is not the function of these facilities as a community space for youths but rather the equitable distribution of supply over space as a "regional" community facility when they decide its scale and location. The research showed that the location neither corresponds to urban hierarchy nor to residential distribution in terms of access, leaving many youths without a facility close to them to use.
This paper also conducted a comparative study of the characteristics of youth facilities in Seoul and Vancouver in terms of their location, operation and accessibility. While youth centers were distributed by administrative convenience, Vancouver"s youth centers were located in smaller community district units with walking access in mind. This also had implication to scale of facilities. Korean youth centers were large scale facilities whereas Vancouver youth centers were mainly smaller with some strategic facilities with extended functions such as swimming pools and ice rinks. Vancouver youth centers were also found that are they were close to schools and residential areas, and were easily reached by younger youths. Due to these characteristics, the role of youth centers are very different in Korea and Vancouver City. From the differences in the two cities approach as found in this paper, we can suggest some policy improvements in Korea such as institutional set up, locational factors and facilities so that youth centers can play a greater social role in community building.
With the recognition of the importance of youth centers, this paper examined the distribution of youth centers in Korea and particularly in Seoul. Due to institutional regulations, the distribution of youth training centers is fixed to one youth center to one district in general. What is means is that it is not the function of these facilities as a community space for youths but rather the equitable distribution of supply over space as a "regional" community facility when they decide its scale and location. The research showed that the location neither corresponds to urban hierarchy nor to residential distribution in terms of access, leaving many youths without a facility close to them to use.
This paper also conducted a comparative study of the characteristics of youth facilities in Seoul and Vancouver in terms of their location, operation and accessibility. While youth centers were distributed by administrative convenience, Vancouver"s youth centers were located in smaller community district units with walking access in mind. This also had implication to scale of facilities. Korean youth centers were large scale facilities whereas Vancouver youth centers were mainly smaller with some strategic facilities with extended functions such as swimming pools and ice rinks. Vancouver youth centers were also found that are they were close to schools and residential areas, and were easily reached by younger youths. Due to these characteristics, the role of youth centers are very different in Korea and Vancouver City. From the differences in the two cities approach as found in this paper, we can suggest some policy improvements in Korea such as institutional set up, locational factors and facilities so that youth centers can play a greater social role in community building.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 청소년수련시설에 관한 이론 및 관련제도의 고찰
3. 국내 청소년수련관 현황과 공간 특성
4. 밴쿠버 청소년수련관
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (2)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
청소년수련시설 공간 이용실태에 관한 연구 - 대구광역시 생활권 청소년 수련시설 중심으로 -
한규대
,
김현주
,
정지석
외 1명
대한건축학회 학술발표대회 논문집 - 계획계
2003
.10
세계박람회에 의한 도시공간 재구조화 특성에 관한 연구
이경진
,
정재용
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2014
.08
사용자 중심의 공공성 실현을 위한 공공도서관의 공간 계획 및 특성에 관한 연구
김세영
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2013
.06
지속적인 지역사회 조직을 위한 생활권 분석 연구 : 성남 기성시가지 태평동 일대의 일상과 지형을 중심으로
한경호
,
한고은
,
이영
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013
.07
안양 유유산업부지의 고대유적과 산업유산의 공존복원 설계연구
오종화
,
최동혁
대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계
2013
.07
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-540-001093007