인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2012.11
- 수록면
- 151 - 158 (8page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
Despite increase in a social requirement of good quality urban spaces and places in Korea still has been holding conventional ways of making a built environment, which results from the tendency of land use plan putting more importance on city function and economic feasibility rather than urban spaces. As a result of this, the stage of architectural design is forced to cope with this rigidity. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze architectural methods and limits of coping with rigid land use plan. To achieve this, design elements and methods of land use plan was analyzed to certify the reason of this rigidity in the first part of this study. Also, architectural elements which are specified in land use plan were subjects for analysis. Through this, types of rigidity in land use plan were categorized into three groups: ‘inductive urban space’, ‘the lack of spatiality’ and ‘inducement to fixed building type’. Three architectural methods of correspondence with these rigidities were deducted; 1)using media expression 2)proposing multi-dimensional facilities for walking 3)variegating architectural types. Nonetheless, these methods cannot be fundamental solutions to create good urban spaces and places. The first is a trick and the second is geared toward excessive design, which leads proposed designs to change. The last type is involved only in superficial cityscape with the lack of integration of urban space. After all, these limits mean that architectural design should be accompanied with the stage of urban design making land use plan in order to create integrated built environments.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Abstract
- 1. 서론
- 2. 토지이용계획 요소와 방식
- 3. 토지이용계획의 경직성
- 4. 건축적 대응방식과 한계
- 5. 결론
- 참고문헌
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-540-000814968
