지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
??This article endeavors to assert and demonstrate that some of the seminal and innovative ideas of poetic creation and poetic language discovered or recovered by the modern Western poetics of linguistic organicism was lacking in modern Korean poetics of Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon.
??Opposing to modern science and industrial technology and their materialistic benefits, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon retained organic viewpoint of the world and nature which they had inherited from the ancient East-Asian traditions, and so made it one of the most brilliant components in their poetics. Nevertheless, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon differ from modern Western poetics in that their poetic theory did not fully develop their organic view of nature into linguistic organicism. Linguistic organicism of Western poetics asserts that poetic intuition depends on new poetic language, and poetic content is inseparable from poetic form, as Western poetics did. Resembling English Romantic poets, Jiyong and Jihoon considered nature and all the creatures in it as living presences and saw the organic relation among them. However, they did neither focus on an organized or organic structure in a poem, nor notice the unique and complicated structure of a poem which unites the logically incompatible aspects of human experience having various dimensions of sensations, feelings, and intellects.
??Above all, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon did not notice, as Cleanth Brooks did, that the recalcitrancy of language is not the cause of frustration and failure in expression, but the origin of poetic productivity and creativity, and that the uniqueness of poetry comes from the belief that poetic language is not referential but functional. Hence they could not explain the process of poetic creation adequately, as the western poetics of modern linguistic formalism did through the comparison of a poem to a living organism.
??Opposing to modern science and industrial technology and their materialistic benefits, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon retained organic viewpoint of the world and nature which they had inherited from the ancient East-Asian traditions, and so made it one of the most brilliant components in their poetics. Nevertheless, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon differ from modern Western poetics in that their poetic theory did not fully develop their organic view of nature into linguistic organicism. Linguistic organicism of Western poetics asserts that poetic intuition depends on new poetic language, and poetic content is inseparable from poetic form, as Western poetics did. Resembling English Romantic poets, Jiyong and Jihoon considered nature and all the creatures in it as living presences and saw the organic relation among them. However, they did neither focus on an organized or organic structure in a poem, nor notice the unique and complicated structure of a poem which unites the logically incompatible aspects of human experience having various dimensions of sensations, feelings, and intellects.
??Above all, Chung Jiyong and Cho Jihoon did not notice, as Cleanth Brooks did, that the recalcitrancy of language is not the cause of frustration and failure in expression, but the origin of poetic productivity and creativity, and that the uniqueness of poetry comes from the belief that poetic language is not referential but functional. Hence they could not explain the process of poetic creation adequately, as the western poetics of modern linguistic formalism did through the comparison of a poem to a living organism.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (11)
참고문헌 신청
정지용 / 1988 / 산문: 정지용 전집 2 / 민음사
조지훈 / 1996 / 詩의 원리: 조지훈 전집 2 / 나남출판
Adams, Hazard / 1971 / Critical Theory Since Plato / Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Brooks, Cleanth / 1948 / Poetry and ‘ironic’ poetry / The English Journal 37(2):57~63
Brooks, Cleanth / 1941 / The Poem as Organism in English Institute Annual 1940 / Columbia UP :20~41
조지훈 / 1996 / 詩의 원리: 조지훈 전집 2 / 나남출판
Adams, Hazard / 1971 / Critical Theory Since Plato / Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Brooks, Cleanth / 1948 / Poetry and ‘ironic’ poetry / The English Journal 37(2):57~63
Brooks, Cleanth / 1941 / The Poem as Organism in English Institute Annual 1940 / Columbia UP :20~41
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
우리 시어의 근대성과 근대적 자각 : 김소월과 정지용의 시어를 중심으로
한국학연구
2003 .11
-
김기림의 과학적 시학 : 시의 사실을 중심으로
한국시학연구
2009 .04
-
Poetic Imagination and Language : On the Poetics of Bachelard
철학
1980 .07
-
시적 형상화 기법에 따른 시 창작 교육 시론(試論)
한국시학연구
2010 .04
-
투명성의 시학 : 오규원 시론 연구
한국시학연구
2007 .12
-
다시 새로운 시론을 위하여
어문론총
2019 .01
-
시의 소통 구조와 시 교육 학습자의 주체성 연구 - 임화의 「우리 옵바와 화로」를 중심으로 -
우리말글
2004 .04
-
박용철 시론 연구 : ‘과학’이란 균열체를 중심으로
한국시학연구
2011 .12
-
전쟁체험과 談論 主體의 존재방식 : 詩論과 詩의 관계를 중심으로 -朴寅煥論-
우리문학연구
2004 .12
-
현대시에 나타난 시적 구조로서의 병렬법
한국시학연구
2003 .11
-
김수영 시론의 원점으로서의 포로체험
한국시학연구
2019 .11
-
김복근 시조 연구 : 시세계의 전개과정과 시적 주제를 중심으로
어문론집
2012 .09
-
서정적 동일성에 이르는 전통적 방법과 그 현대적 의미
어문학
2004 .12
-
芝薰의 漢詩 硏究
한문학논집(漢文學論集)
2013 .01
-
『백록담』의 시형식 연구
한국시학연구
2012 .12
-
박용철의 시적 언어론
어문학
2004 .03
-
시란 무엇인가 : 박용철의 시론과 관련하여
한국학연구
2012 .12
-
침묵과 고백-T.S.엘리엇과 로버트 로웰의 시적 실험
현대영미시연구
2012 .01
-
The currency of Wordsworthian Ideals in Modern and Postmodern Poetics --Wordsworth the Anti-Romantic?--
현대영미시연구
2006 .01
-
시적 과학과 융합 교육 : 21세기 교양교육의 방향성에 대한 탐구
어문론집
2018 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000807308