메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
구자광 (고려대학교)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제19호
발행연도
2008.12
수록면
7 - 32 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper interprets Gary Snyder’s ‘bioregionalism’ and identifies risks of region-centralism implicit in bioregionalism and explores a possible solution to the problem. Snyder’s bioregionalism is to dig up ‘Turtle Island,’ an original name given to North America by native Americans, from underneath the ‘alien’ nation-state ‘America.’ With the excavation of Turtle Island as a bioregion, Snyder wants to become a ‘born-again native’ of Turtle Island by reinhabiting it. Ecological ethics and politics move from nation-statehood to bioregionalism. Instead of domination of any specific species, any species including mountains, rivers, grass, trees, humans as well, have equal membership in a bioregion. Bioregionalism definitely deconstrucs human-centralism. However, too much emphasis on a particular bioregion and its members could end in region-centralism. Inclusion/exclusion in terms of membership can be the same as in nation-state system. To guarantee exclusive membership to a specific bioregion, drastically reactionary measures could be taken such as, a declaration
of a region as a separate statehood or an isolation of a bioregion by shutting down the bioregion. As was shown in German Nazi and more recent anti-immigration trends, a more ruthless exclusion of non-members for the sake of purity and security can be put into practice. Ecologically oriented movements could be exploited as excuses to block any immigration and flows into any specific bioregion.
Snyder’s wariness to drive away any reactionary and nationalist and ethnic parochialism from bioregionalism introduces cosmopolitanism as an escape from region-centralism. Snyder seems to apply Kantian cosmopolitanism to bioregionalism. But in the Kantian cosmopolitanism, acquisition of citizenship should be preceded before any cosmopolitan rights could be recognized and instituted. Only citizens can be granted with ‘the right of temporary sojourn.’ Any cosmopolitan moves are still conditioned by nation-statehood. If
bioregionalism should replace any nation-state, it should go beyond any place-centralism, home, homeland, nation, state. This paper argues that Snyder proposes a kind of cosmopolitan bioregionalism as a solution by keeping balance between cosmopolitanism and bioregionalism.

목차

서론
본론
결론
인용문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-000780304