지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is a general opinion that the meanings of the idioms cannot be inferred by the composition of the literal meanings of the constituent elements. Noncompositionality or opacity of the meaning is considered as the important characteristic of the idioms. Nonetheless, quite a few cases are found in which the meanings are formed by composition of the literal meaning of the constituent elements.
In order to illuminate these, careful consideration was given to the ‘eye’ idioms. In the first place, the polysemy of the ‘eye’ were analyzed and organized again on the basis of the established dictionary. Then ‘eye’ idioms, which are the combined constructions of precedent and following elements, forming the construction of ‘눈{에/을/이} + V’ were assorted according to the transferred aspect of the meaning used for the constituent elements.
The type combining basic meaning with basic meaning is called [X + Y], transferred meaning with basic meaning, [X + Y’], and transferred meaning with transferred meaning, [X’ + Y’]. It is called [Z] type if the meaning can not be inferred by the combination of primary and transferred meaning.
The result of the analysis showed that the formation of the ‘eye’ idioms were greatly influenced by the function of the three meanings, ‘gaze’ ‘attention’ ‘judgement’ among the polysemy of ‘eye’.
It was also revealed that [X + Y]type accounted for 6.2%, [X + Y’] 4.9%, [X’ + Y] 11.1%, and [X’ + Y’] about 11.1% respectively. About 33% of the whole ‘eye’ idioms are composed of the combination of polysemy of the constituent elements. These show that there exists a close relationship between the idiomatic expressions and the constituent elements.
Further studies are required on the semantic relationship between idiom and polysemy.
In order to illuminate these, careful consideration was given to the ‘eye’ idioms. In the first place, the polysemy of the ‘eye’ were analyzed and organized again on the basis of the established dictionary. Then ‘eye’ idioms, which are the combined constructions of precedent and following elements, forming the construction of ‘눈{에/을/이} + V’ were assorted according to the transferred aspect of the meaning used for the constituent elements.
The type combining basic meaning with basic meaning is called [X + Y], transferred meaning with basic meaning, [X + Y’], and transferred meaning with transferred meaning, [X’ + Y’]. It is called [Z] type if the meaning can not be inferred by the combination of primary and transferred meaning.
The result of the analysis showed that the formation of the ‘eye’ idioms were greatly influenced by the function of the three meanings, ‘gaze’ ‘attention’ ‘judgement’ among the polysemy of ‘eye’.
It was also revealed that [X + Y]type accounted for 6.2%, [X + Y’] 4.9%, [X’ + Y] 11.1%, and [X’ + Y’] about 11.1% respectively. About 33% of the whole ‘eye’ idioms are composed of the combination of polysemy of the constituent elements. These show that there exists a close relationship between the idiomatic expressions and the constituent elements.
Further studies are required on the semantic relationship between idiom and polysemy.
목차
1. 서론
2. 관용표현과 다의어의 연관성
3. ‘눈’의 어의 설정
4. ‘눈’ 관용표현의 구성
5. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
부록
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-703-000756213