메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김흥규 (연세대학교) 안정숙 (연세대학교) 김민혁 (연세대학교)
저널정보
대한소아청소년정신의학회 소아청소년정신의학 소아청소년정신의학 제23권 제3호
발행연도
2012.9
수록면
127 - 133 (7page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Objectives:The aims of this study were to examine agreement between parent and teacher ratings of the Korean version Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ-Kr) for the children’s psychopathology and to determine whether it is effective in diagnostics as the Korean version of Childhood Behavior Checklist (K-CBCL).
Methods:SDQ-Kr and K-CBCL were completed by parents and teachers of 165 children aged 6-12 years. The clinical diagnosis was made by a child and adolescent psychiatrist who did not have knowledge of the outcome. Spearman’s correlations were computed for associations between parents’ and teachers’ ratings on a subscale level. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed for the influence of child’s age and sex on the results. Finally, AUC values were calculated for the diagnostic capacity and the difference between informants was tested using the z test.
Results:High correlations were observed between parents’ and teachers’ SDQ-Kr on every scale. Parents were more sensitive to emotional symptoms of girls, while teachers appeared to be more responsive to externalized symptoms of boys, inattention-hyperactivity of young children, and emotional symptoms of seniors. Parents’ SDQ-Kr demonstrated the highest prediction of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
Conclusion:Teachers’ SDQ-Kr can be used in identification of child psychopathology when parents are absent or when their reliability is considered low.

목차

서론
방법
결과
고찰
결론
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-516-000731508