지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study explores how we can rightly interpret the existential struggle in Philippians 1:21-24 in comparison with recent scholars’ interpretations based upon Hellenistic view of death. For this purpose, this study displays the recent trend of research on the Paul’s existential struggle manifested in the selected text of Phil. 1:21-24. In other words, it explores why Paul faces up with this existential struggle between life and death, what kind of language expresses his own theological feature, and how we can interpret the religious language of Paul’s existential struggle in light of his prominent eschatology in Phil. 2:6-11. For the sake of an advanced exegetical exploration of the text, this research not only critically evaluates Droge’s view of the text’s intention as suicide and Palmer’s view of it’s intention as escapist resignation to death, but also examines Croy’s recent study on its rhetorical features. Then this study introduces Cousar, Reuman and O’Brien’s recent exegetical work on martyrdom intention in the text, and critically examines their works. By evaluating both theoretical work and exegetical work, our critical review argues that it implies the sophisticated theological intention, e.g. that Paul’s eschatological view of death implied in religious language of Phil. 2:21-24 is proposed to resist against both sacrificial death as the means of preserving religious privileges implied in eschatological death and suicidal death as means of sacrificial protest dramatized by Roman view of noble death. It also claims that Phil. 1:21-24 is designed to not simply evoke Hellenistic view of death as escapism, but suggest political theology against imposed imperialistic ideology and cultural convention of competitive pursuit of higher social rank. In conclusion, this study implicitly raises the issue of how Paul’s eschatology in the text contribute to overcoming our own Korean political culture of competition for higher social rank in neo-liberalistic imperial system of banking capitalism.
목차
I. 서론: 1장 21-24절에서의 바울의 실존적 투쟁의 중요성과 연구 동향 개괄
II. 본론: 빌 1:21-24에 대한 헬레니즘 시대의 죽음 이해와 관련된 주석학적 쟁점
III. 결론: 순교설을 넘어선 로마 제국의 가치체계를 비판하려는 정치신학적 의도
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-230-000619942