지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper is for a comparative study between theology and science in view of the theory of paradigm shifts. Empirical rationalists’ thesis that scientific knowledge which can be justified only by the empirical observation is meaningful has failed in verifying their arguments. And also by the concept of ‘theory-laden observation,’ their thesis of objectivity and neutrality of scientific knowledge fell down. Meanwhile, Thomas Kuhn’s ‘theory of scientific revolution’ which is based on the understanding of the history of science emerges. According to the theory, the science is not developed by the accumulation of knowledge and gradual modification but by the revolutionary replacement of the normal science with a new paradigm of science which is appeared with the crisis triggered by the anomalous data in a certain point. In this process, ‘the incommensur ability’ which is a core concept in Kuhn’s paradigm shift theory emerges. Incommensurability does not mean the in-comparability nor relativism but includes local comparability and continuity in fundamental scientific practices. Accepting Kuhn’s thesis, Hans Kung observes the history of Christian theology in 4-5 stages of the paradigm shift following Kuhn’s basic frame of normal science-crisis-new paradigm. Based on the moderate concept of incommensur-ability mentioned above, Kung articulates the ‘truth’ and the continuity of Christian traditions. It seems that Kung has successfully applied Kuhn’s thesis in theology except some tendency to objectivism due to Christian truth. Paying attention to the concept of incommensurability, one needs to be cautious not to be fell into either rationalistic objectivism or radical relativism in promoting a new theological paradigm for future.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 경험적 합리주의자들의 견해와 쿤의 과학혁명론
Ⅲ. 정상과학과 패러다임의 교체에 의한 과학혁명이론
Ⅳ. 과학혁명과 패러다임의 변화에서의 약불가능성(Incommensurability)과 연속성의 문제
Ⅴ. 나가는 글
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-230-000619977