인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Legislative power is indispensable for national operations and the fundamental rights guaranteed. The legislation is not only expertise, but also a duty of the legislature. Consequently, the legislation does duty as the boundary of freedom of the legislature.
Legislative power should be actively exercised in accordance with the change of time and social environment. Therefore the National Assembly is obliged to observe the situation of law and continue to increase the normative effect of the law or to meet before becoming the law unconstitutional appropriate action by the existing system is better adapted to the actual situation. This observation is required in relation to the compulsory repair an independent legislative duty, since the observation can be made independent of the repair.
In South Korea, the Constitutional Court can not the process and the content of the observation, but only the Non-fulfillment of the legislative consequences by the legislature control. Object of observation is a currently valid law. The South Korean Constitutional Court can observation duty of legislators to the extent that the law in the near future threatens to turn into the unconstitutionality of the doubts about the very serious violation of fundamental rights is still present and the constitutionality of the law is doubted very strong, despite its incompatibility with the Constitution or notes is not. If the legislature ignored the observation by the constitutional court decision, the party concerned a constitutional complaint against this legislative omission “unlimited” rise. In this process, the Constitutional Court declared this omission is unconstitutional, and as a non-legislature may take an interim regulation.
Furthermore, you will be subsumed by the legislative omission as a type of violation of the obligation to improve legislation to figure out how to control the formation of legislative freedom.
Legislative power should be actively exercised in accordance with the change of time and social environment. Therefore the National Assembly is obliged to observe the situation of law and continue to increase the normative effect of the law or to meet before becoming the law unconstitutional appropriate action by the existing system is better adapted to the actual situation. This observation is required in relation to the compulsory repair an independent legislative duty, since the observation can be made independent of the repair.
In South Korea, the Constitutional Court can not the process and the content of the observation, but only the Non-fulfillment of the legislative consequences by the legislature control. Object of observation is a currently valid law. The South Korean Constitutional Court can observation duty of legislators to the extent that the law in the near future threatens to turn into the unconstitutionality of the doubts about the very serious violation of fundamental rights is still present and the constitutionality of the law is doubted very strong, despite its incompatibility with the Constitution or notes is not. If the legislature ignored the observation by the constitutional court decision, the party concerned a constitutional complaint against this legislative omission “unlimited” rise. In this process, the Constitutional Court declared this omission is unconstitutional, and as a non-legislature may take an interim regulation.
Furthermore, you will be subsumed by the legislative omission as a type of violation of the obligation to improve legislation to figure out how to control the formation of legislative freedom.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-360-000510783
