인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
New technologies lead to new forms and uses for copyrighted works, which in turn lead to the appearance of new forms of copyright infringement that were hitherto unforeseen. While the Internet allows users to access and use the information they need anytime, it also serves as a readily accessible route for copyright infringement. Thus has been cited the need to prevent copyright infringement and monitor against illegal works on the Internet, in relation to which online service providers (OSP) have been identified and even mandated as actors to perform this role. In Korea, following the legislation of exemption provisions on March 27, 2003, the issue of liability for online service providers under the Copyright Act has evolved through further clarification and specification of the scope of exemption. Laws regarding the liability of OSPs were amended twice, on June 30, 2011, and December 2, 2011, to prepare for the domestic implementation of the Korea-US and Korea-EU free trade agreements. This has led to a wide range of changes, e.g., liability provisions regarding OSPs being subdivided, court orders issued against OSPs, information about persons copying and transmitting being provided and amendments being made to legal provisions stipulating the collection of illegal works. Through the recent two rounds of amendments performed in 2011, in preparation of the Korea-EU and Korea-US FTAs, the exemption scope of OSPs has been specified to a much more detailed extent, and with OSPs being awarded impunity according to whether they meet the necessary criteria, hopefully it will be possible, at last, to resolve the majority of issues related to the liability for OSPs.
It can be agreed in principle that OSPs who, in the name of sharing information on the Internet, enable illegal trafficking of copyrighted works should be held liable to a certain extent. However, excessive regulation on these lines could greatly impede the functionality of the Internet, infringe on freedom of expression and lead to censorship or other societal problems, and thus legislation and legal application should proceed in a careful manner. The Copyright Act should endeavor to ensure not only the protection of copyright holders’ rights but the fair use of copyrighted material as well.
It can be agreed in principle that OSPs who, in the name of sharing information on the Internet, enable illegal trafficking of copyrighted works should be held liable to a certain extent. However, excessive regulation on these lines could greatly impede the functionality of the Internet, infringe on freedom of expression and lead to censorship or other societal problems, and thus legislation and legal application should proceed in a careful manner. The Copyright Act should endeavor to ensure not only the protection of copyright holders’ rights but the fair use of copyrighted material as well.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-360-000510849
