지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper tries to deal with some conflicts and dilemma of relationship between China and Korea in the G-2 era. Sino-Korea relations have achieved a full-scale development with an unprecedented size and level since the normalization of relation between China and Korea in 1992. However in the process of mutual development, there ha ve been some conflicts and dilemma which has confronted the two nations. Nowadays, it seems that two nations have to overcome many obstacles to hinder them from developing and advancing each others’ relation in the future. As far as I understand, it is critical for them to revolve these problems such as Korea-US alliance, the North Korea’s nuclear issue, the Korea-China FTA, and economic cooperaton between China and North Korea. These issues would become a barometer to evaluate the possibility of mutual prosperity and development in the hereafter. Therefore the Korean Government needs to maintain some strategic positions and attitudes toward China to achieve a full-fledged realization of common interest in each other. Under the circumstance of the emergence of G-2 era, we must pose several strategic positions that the Korea government have to hold consistently as below.
Firstly, Based on strategic pragmatism and multi-vector diplomacy, it would be desirable to proceed a strategy of “alliance with the U.S. and cooperation with China” which requires more in-depth recognition of difference between alliance and strategic cooperation regarding their characteristics and roles playing in them. Secondly, in order to ensure stability and peace in North-Eastern Asia, Korean Government have to be capable of playing an important role as a bridge state in establishing a stable Sino-US relationship. Thirdly, from the viewpoint that the rise of China is an opportunity rather than threat to East Asia, Korean policy to China is required not only to promote a full-scale development of relation, but also to alleviate some conflicts between China and Korea. Fourthly, it is necessary to continue a trilateral full cooperation with US, China, and Korea to revolve the North Korea’s nuclear issue. Fifthly, because the Korea-China FTA and economic cooperations between China and North Korea would make great contributions to the stability of Korean peninsula, we had better support these policies positively. Finally, from the historical viewpoint, it reminds me that the rise of China would have been more conducive to fostering stable and peaceful environment in the East Asia.
Firstly, Based on strategic pragmatism and multi-vector diplomacy, it would be desirable to proceed a strategy of “alliance with the U.S. and cooperation with China” which requires more in-depth recognition of difference between alliance and strategic cooperation regarding their characteristics and roles playing in them. Secondly, in order to ensure stability and peace in North-Eastern Asia, Korean Government have to be capable of playing an important role as a bridge state in establishing a stable Sino-US relationship. Thirdly, from the viewpoint that the rise of China is an opportunity rather than threat to East Asia, Korean policy to China is required not only to promote a full-scale development of relation, but also to alleviate some conflicts between China and Korea. Fourthly, it is necessary to continue a trilateral full cooperation with US, China, and Korea to revolve the North Korea’s nuclear issue. Fifthly, because the Korea-China FTA and economic cooperations between China and North Korea would make great contributions to the stability of Korean peninsula, we had better support these policies positively. Finally, from the historical viewpoint, it reminds me that the rise of China would have been more conducive to fostering stable and peaceful environment in the East Asia.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. G-2시대의 도래와 한국외교의 전략적 태도
Ⅲ. G-2시대 한중관계의 주요딜레마와 쟁점
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (68)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-003117839