인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Imjin war outbroken by structural paradox of Hideyoshi regime had a characteristic that war had to be continued until the paradox is solved. Invasion, also, related with the peace and power of Hideyoshi regime. The paradox of regime is phrased as an unrest of commanding and internal conflict of Japanese military. The peace and power of Hideyoshi regime is highly related with conditions of pacification.
Bargaining between Chosun and Tsushima before the invasion was only had an intention to dispacth of diplomat(Tong-sin-sa) and it was far from idea of Hideyoshi. In addition, Chosun wanted to get cause of negotiation rather than grasp the meaning of bargaining. In other side, Hideyoshi required passage for invasion to Ming dynasty. This ended Chosun-Japan relationship and triggered Invasion in 1592.
Connected with it"s east-asia strategy, Ming sent troops to Chosun and it was ultimately aimed at block the invasion of Japan in Korea Peninsula. Thus, Bargaings of Chosun-Japan and Ming-Japan in Imjin war time were peace treaty without peace significantly related with contemporary warfare.
Theme of yip-cho and the cession of Chosun"s four province were unchanged while the logic of Chosun-Japan treaty changed along with the alteration of war state. Japan, also, wanted to separate the negotiation with Chosun and Ming. With this rule, Japan pressed Chosun with result of Ming-Japan treaty. On the other side, Ming forced Chosun to sign the mutual agreement with Japan for the purpose of withdraw the Japanese military in Korea Peninsula and longed for investiture of Japan. It is good to evaluate that negotiation between
Ming and Japan was effective in terms of stopping the battle temporarily. Though, It was not enough for the end of war. In other words, It was not suitable for strategy that aims at sustaining an international order among three east-asian countries while casting a long shadow to Ming"s east-asia strategy. Additionally, Chosun had no choice but to led by Ming because the dynasty limited Chosun"s right to command and diplomatic power.
In the end, negotiation of Chosun-Ming, Chosun-Japan resulted in failure coincide with Hideyoshi"s investiture by Ming dynasty. Therefore, Jungyu war(1597) began. In this time, there were widespread concerns of war in Japan and with Ming"s deeper in, Japan devoted itself to defend against Ming stationed at south coast retreated. The commader of Japan also gave much effort to disengage the troops by the peace treaty after Hideyoshi"s death.
Generals were positive to withdrawal negotiation, Chosun had no means to deal with. Since this 7-years long Imjin war triggered by paradox of structure of Hideyoshi regime=daimyo coalition government, Chosun-Japan relation diplomacy get settled down after Tokugawa Ieyasu got overwhelming military power over Daimyo resulted from winning in Sekigihara battle.
Bargaining between Chosun and Tsushima before the invasion was only had an intention to dispacth of diplomat(Tong-sin-sa) and it was far from idea of Hideyoshi. In addition, Chosun wanted to get cause of negotiation rather than grasp the meaning of bargaining. In other side, Hideyoshi required passage for invasion to Ming dynasty. This ended Chosun-Japan relationship and triggered Invasion in 1592.
Connected with it"s east-asia strategy, Ming sent troops to Chosun and it was ultimately aimed at block the invasion of Japan in Korea Peninsula. Thus, Bargaings of Chosun-Japan and Ming-Japan in Imjin war time were peace treaty without peace significantly related with contemporary warfare.
Theme of yip-cho and the cession of Chosun"s four province were unchanged while the logic of Chosun-Japan treaty changed along with the alteration of war state. Japan, also, wanted to separate the negotiation with Chosun and Ming. With this rule, Japan pressed Chosun with result of Ming-Japan treaty. On the other side, Ming forced Chosun to sign the mutual agreement with Japan for the purpose of withdraw the Japanese military in Korea Peninsula and longed for investiture of Japan. It is good to evaluate that negotiation between
Ming and Japan was effective in terms of stopping the battle temporarily. Though, It was not enough for the end of war. In other words, It was not suitable for strategy that aims at sustaining an international order among three east-asian countries while casting a long shadow to Ming"s east-asia strategy. Additionally, Chosun had no choice but to led by Ming because the dynasty limited Chosun"s right to command and diplomatic power.
In the end, negotiation of Chosun-Ming, Chosun-Japan resulted in failure coincide with Hideyoshi"s investiture by Ming dynasty. Therefore, Jungyu war(1597) began. In this time, there were widespread concerns of war in Japan and with Ming"s deeper in, Japan devoted itself to defend against Ming stationed at south coast retreated. The commader of Japan also gave much effort to disengage the troops by the peace treaty after Hideyoshi"s death.
Generals were positive to withdrawal negotiation, Chosun had no means to deal with. Since this 7-years long Imjin war triggered by paradox of structure of Hideyoshi regime=daimyo coalition government, Chosun-Japan relation diplomacy get settled down after Tokugawa Ieyasu got overwhelming military power over Daimyo resulted from winning in Sekigihara battle.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-900-003118221