지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the 21st century, I believe the mission of the church and Chirstian education will be defined by a new, more profound awareness of the welfare perspective. To do that, we need to ask “What is the relationship between Christian education and Christian welfare?” This study is to find out how to merge Christian education and Christian welfare. With this purpose this paper sought welfare perspective from both Letty Russell’s Christian Education theory and Maria Harris’s theory. And I evaluated the strengths and weakness of their welfare perspective.
Letty M. Russell designed a educational ministry of the church in the perspective of christian welfare. It appears from her proposal to call the church ‘Witnessing Community" of pluralistic system in order to stress ‘church toward the world and the other people" and emphasizing that Salvation is humanization encompassing not only the redemption of the soul but also the liberation from the socially oppressing systems.
On the other hand, Maria Harris considers five patterns of life demonstrated in the primitive Christian community described in Acts 2:42-47 -kerygma, didache, koinonia, leiturgia, diakonia- as a prototype of curriculum for church education. And she insists that a complete church curriculum can be established only when integrating these five forms of interrelated curricula. Thus she develops a church curriculum theory to integrate Diakonia with educational ministry of the church.
In conclusion, Contemporary Church should be both ‘educational ministry of the church toward christian welfare" and ‘Diakonia from a standpoint educational ministry of the church". That’s exactly what it is called Holistic Educational Ministry in this age of Welfare.
Letty M. Russell designed a educational ministry of the church in the perspective of christian welfare. It appears from her proposal to call the church ‘Witnessing Community" of pluralistic system in order to stress ‘church toward the world and the other people" and emphasizing that Salvation is humanization encompassing not only the redemption of the soul but also the liberation from the socially oppressing systems.
On the other hand, Maria Harris considers five patterns of life demonstrated in the primitive Christian community described in Acts 2:42-47 -kerygma, didache, koinonia, leiturgia, diakonia- as a prototype of curriculum for church education. And she insists that a complete church curriculum can be established only when integrating these five forms of interrelated curricula. Thus she develops a church curriculum theory to integrate Diakonia with educational ministry of the church.
In conclusion, Contemporary Church should be both ‘educational ministry of the church toward christian welfare" and ‘Diakonia from a standpoint educational ministry of the church". That’s exactly what it is called Holistic Educational Ministry in this age of Welfare.
목차
I. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 레티러셀의 기독교교육론에 나타난 복지적 관점
Ⅲ. 마리아 해리스의 기독교교육론에 나타난 복지적 관점
Ⅳ. 러셀과 해리스의 복지적 관점의 비교분석과 교육목회적 시사점
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-200-003565356