지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2011.12
- 수록면
- 124 - 134 (11page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The space has been interpreted from various perspectives, such as hierarchical, cultural, economic, political factors, etc. So we can see the space as a social existence. Space is now being formed through the dialectical relations of these elements. From this point of view, this study started to research the spatial practice of morden people through the case in the early 20th century film. With the discourse of Henri Lefebvre and David Harvey, and Michel de Certeau"s theory, this research tried to find the mechanisms of spatial practice. Also Benjamin is a philosopher who intervenes the relationship between modernity and cultural production and his way of reading cultural phenomena seems to serve as the useful methodology of cultural studies.
Modern people were individual unawared of the era, awakened to the ego. They were wandering the room and the street, private and public places. They were city dwellers walking around, collecting goods, and living of everyday life. Spatial practice is a fixed activity and have continuity. spatial practice appeared in the early 20th century film is at the intersection of social practices and the practice of everyday life. Social practices are a fixed practice and continuous practice. The practices of everyday life are nomadic practice and amusable practice. Modern people accommodate and adapt to a given space of the city through fixed practice. They realizes the access and the distance from spaces through continuous practice. They select and approved the spaces through nomadic practice. And they possess exclusively and utilize the spaces through amusable practice. Through These research spatial practices, it could easily found similarities and differences between modern space on the early 20th century and contemporary space of 21st century. True modern is not the past but the present.
Modern people were individual unawared of the era, awakened to the ego. They were wandering the room and the street, private and public places. They were city dwellers walking around, collecting goods, and living of everyday life. Spatial practice is a fixed activity and have continuity. spatial practice appeared in the early 20th century film is at the intersection of social practices and the practice of everyday life. Social practices are a fixed practice and continuous practice. The practices of everyday life are nomadic practice and amusable practice. Modern people accommodate and adapt to a given space of the city through fixed practice. They realizes the access and the distance from spaces through continuous practice. They select and approved the spaces through nomadic practice. And they possess exclusively and utilize the spaces through amusable practice. Through These research spatial practices, it could easily found similarities and differences between modern space on the early 20th century and contemporary space of 21st century. True modern is not the past but the present.
목차
Abstract
1. 서론
2. 근대인과 공간
3. 공간적 실천
4. 20세기 초 영화 속에서의 공간적 실천
5. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (21)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
현대건축에 나타난 일상성의 특징에 관한 연구 : 일본 현대건축의 사례를 중심으로
김정숙
,
최왕돈
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2013
.04
노인요양시설 공용생활공간의 안내표식 시스템에 관한 연구
정미렴
,
김대년
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
국내 종합병원의 공용공간에서 나타나는 군집유형과 이용행태에 관한 조사 연구
손지혜
,
양내원
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
노인전문병원 평면구조의 위계에 관한 연구
이행우
,
김석태
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
1990년 이후 한국 개신교회의 예배유형에 따른 예배공간특성 : 전통예배공간과 현대예배공간을 중심으로
김기현
,
이규백
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2009
.10
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0