메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강용기 (전남대학교)
저널정보
문학과환경학회 문학과환경 문학과환경 제12권 1호
발행연도
2013.6
수록면
33 - 51 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The foundationalist view of nature like Deep Ecology is rooted in Plato’s Ideology, per se. In other words, a priori reasoning has justified the intrinsic value of nature since Deep Ecology launched its ecological agenda in the early 1970s. However, any essentialist view of nature cannot afford its logical justification without reducing to anthropomorphism or discourse for the privileged, just as criticized by the post-modern discourse, social ecology, eco-feminism and the buddhist ecology in common. That is why we need not the philosophy of reduction but one of organic articulation. And Deweyan environmental pragmatism suggests such an organic view of nature.
John Dewey does not accept a priori reasoning as his epistemological logic. At most, it works as a part of supernatural experience. The organic concept of experience, which is individual or communal as well as tangible or intangible, helps to find the way to face the problematic situation. Believing in the power of experimental intelligence and plurality, we might say, Dewey attempts to reconstruct a new ecological philosophy on the basis of scientific inquiry. Thus, Deweyan eco-sophy escapes from its logical dilemma on the one hand, it could well-function as an efficient environmental discourse on the other

목차

1. 들어가며
2. 생태철학의 폐기
3. 생태철학의 재구성
4. 나가면서
〈인용문헌〉
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-800-003337836