지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
After postcolonialism, nationalism has been criticized for its ‘local’ tendencies and essentialism. Postcolonialism reflects the features of globalism such as free migration across nations and cultural exchanges, and focuses on the multicultural phenomena. It deconstructs logocentrism, phallocentrism, and eurocentrism in the western way of thinking, emphasizing cultural hybridity and diversity. Diaspora, for instance, makes a good example of disagreement between nationalist identity as a single, pure, and homogeneous entity and its actual global, multicultural existentiality.
The postcolonial criticism on nationalism, however, may be proper for western nationalism, but not for native nationalism of the third world. Native nationalism investigates ‘partisan universality,’ fighting against colonialism, criticising western universality which is set up on the colonial civilization. In the meanwhile, it intervenes in the social ‘antagonistic’ relations to help other social movements such as class struggle and gender trouble etc.
Nationalism, according to Slavoj ?i?ek, is an ‘empty signifier’ whose meaning can be changed in accordance with the relationship among subjects in the Symbolic Order. In the era of global capitalism or neo-liberalism in which the tendency to the market society and world market gets more and more dominant, nationalism means not an old-fashioned, out-of-date relic of the past, but an effective weapon with which all nations of the third world build solidarity and cooperation.
The postcolonial criticism on nationalism, however, may be proper for western nationalism, but not for native nationalism of the third world. Native nationalism investigates ‘partisan universality,’ fighting against colonialism, criticising western universality which is set up on the colonial civilization. In the meanwhile, it intervenes in the social ‘antagonistic’ relations to help other social movements such as class struggle and gender trouble etc.
Nationalism, according to Slavoj ?i?ek, is an ‘empty signifier’ whose meaning can be changed in accordance with the relationship among subjects in the Symbolic Order. In the era of global capitalism or neo-liberalism in which the tendency to the market society and world market gets more and more dominant, nationalism means not an old-fashioned, out-of-date relic of the past, but an effective weapon with which all nations of the third world build solidarity and cooperation.
목차
국문초록
1. 대타자로서의 민족, 민족주의
2. 민족주의와 디아스포라
3. 탈식민주의와 민족주의 재고
4. 새로운 보편성을 향하여
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-300-002899476