메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
역사교육연구회 역사교육 歷史敎育 第127輯
발행연도
2013.9
수록면
1 - 24 (24page)
DOI
10.18622/kher.2013.09.127.1

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In spite of the possible merits of adopting new perspectives on history education for history teaching, recent theory application to history curriculum and textbooks has been showing noticeable harmful effects. First, the principle of sequence, without critical consideration of its rationale and adaptability, has unsuccessfully sustained as a guideline in selecting and organizing contents, resulting inconsiderate and almost incomprehensible textbook accounts for both teachers and students. Differentiating topics or themes for primary and secondary school levels often hampered easy to follow description of historical events, thus requiring more efforts of reconnecting separated topics, events, and periods. Second, the argument for the integration of Korean and World history together for junior high level was implemented by juxtaposing Korean history units and World history units awkwardly, obscuring its purpose of broadening students’ historical perspective. In addition, too much emphasis on interactions and exchanges between cultures and regions of the world forced textbook authors to enumerate cases and evidences of these activities without proper consideration of their historical significance. Problems of sequence and integration of Korean and world history are too serious for classroom history teaching to be regarded just as transitional process of adaptation. Effectiveness of their theory application should be reconsidered in order to remedy its disadvantages.

목차

1. 서론
2. 다시 돌아보는 이론과 현장
3. 이론 적용의 난맥: 계열성 적용의 사례
4. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-370-002842935