지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Even after the fall of the Choi House’s Military regime in 1258, Goryeo king was without full control of the military, politics and government officials. And after the peace appointment with Mongol in 1259, Goryeo leaders assumed that the relationship with the Mongols would be no different from the ones that the Goryeo had with other Chinese-based dynasties, which is tributary-appointment relationship. In that relationship, the emperor would not interfere in Goryeo affairs. In this condition, Im yeon(林衍, ?～1270) dethroned the sitting king Won-jong(元宗, 1259～1274) in 1269.
The Mongols, who assumed that the relationship with Goryeo was similar to subjection relationship in their experience, accepted the dethronement as a rebellion against the Mongol emperor, intervened actively and reinstated Won-jong. Through this process, the power structure of Mongol Subjugation period was established. In this power structure, the king with the Mongol emperor’s power and authority became the sole center of Goryeo governance once again. With the change, however, the emperor’s authority that had been valid almost only in diplomatic terms before became to have actual power ‘in’ Goryeo, and the Goryeo kings’ status as vassals of the emperor also became practical ‘in’ Goryeo. In the power structure with the Mongol emperor’s authority on top, the power went along with the relations and the stability and closeness of the relations with the Mongol emperor and the imperial family. Now the Goryeo kings had to make efforts to intensify their personal and familial ties with the Mongols, and used those ties to maintain their kingship and the control over the government.
The Mongols, who assumed that the relationship with Goryeo was similar to subjection relationship in their experience, accepted the dethronement as a rebellion against the Mongol emperor, intervened actively and reinstated Won-jong. Through this process, the power structure of Mongol Subjugation period was established. In this power structure, the king with the Mongol emperor’s power and authority became the sole center of Goryeo governance once again. With the change, however, the emperor’s authority that had been valid almost only in diplomatic terms before became to have actual power ‘in’ Goryeo, and the Goryeo kings’ status as vassals of the emperor also became practical ‘in’ Goryeo. In the power structure with the Mongol emperor’s authority on top, the power went along with the relations and the stability and closeness of the relations with the Mongol emperor and the imperial family. Now the Goryeo kings had to make efforts to intensify their personal and familial ties with the Mongols, and used those ties to maintain their kingship and the control over the government.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 講和 이후 고려-몽골 관계의 불안정성
Ⅲ. 元宗 廢位사건과 고려-몽골 관계
Ⅳ. 元宗 復位의 과정과 권력구조의 변화
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (4)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1356(공민왕 5)~1369년(공민왕 18) 고려-몽골(원) 관계의 성격 : ‘원간섭기’와의 연속성을 중심으로
崔鍾奭
역사교육
2010
.12
恭愍王代후반 親明정책의 한 배경 : 몽골 복속기 권력구조에 대한 트라우마
이명미
사학연구
2014
.03
몽골의 침략과 고려 무인정권 및 삼별초의 ‘島嶼海洋戰略’ : 그 동아시아적 의의
姜鳳龍
동양사학연구
2011
.06
고려 대몽항쟁기 도환인(逃還人)의 유형과 강도조정(江都朝廷)의 도환인 활용
강재광
역사와현실
2012
.03
고려의 對蒙 대응 논리와 ‘大國이미지’ : 1231, 1232년 외교문서를 중심으로
김보광
한국사학보
2015
.11
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-910-002844655