지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper seeks to find some idiosyncratic characteristics for the understanding of Jesus Christ of Youngmo Ryu(1890-1981) who understands Christianity through his own perspective of East-Asian religious traditions such as Confucianism, Buddhism and Daoism. Ryu divides self as two: “jena”(the body-centered, or mind-centered life which strives to worldly things) and “eolna(true self).” He lived a sincere and ascetic life(such as fasting, meditating, and abstaining from sex life) of practicing denial of “jena” through accomplishing “eolna” by the help of God and also by using his cultivational efforts to the extreme.
For Ryu, Jesus is essentially the same as a human being, but Jesus is different from the fact that he can be Christ through his perfect accomplishment of his own eolna, by renunciating his jena. Thus, Ryu’s understanding is very different from the doctrines of Jesus Christ as two points: First, Jesus is the same being who has existential limitation. Second, Ryu asserts that savior cannot be limited only for Jesus Christ and Christianity because everybody become an ultimate human being by following some profound religious traditions.
In conclusion, I asserts that his understanding of Jesus Christ can be summarized the point that Jesus is Christ, but Christ is not Jesus alone. Although Ryu’s understanding of Jesus Christi is one of the good examples for doing Korean indigenous theology, we should keenly aware the point that his understanding of Jesus Christ is not the same as a doctrinal assertion of Christology.
For Ryu, Jesus is essentially the same as a human being, but Jesus is different from the fact that he can be Christ through his perfect accomplishment of his own eolna, by renunciating his jena. Thus, Ryu’s understanding is very different from the doctrines of Jesus Christ as two points: First, Jesus is the same being who has existential limitation. Second, Ryu asserts that savior cannot be limited only for Jesus Christ and Christianity because everybody become an ultimate human being by following some profound religious traditions.
In conclusion, I asserts that his understanding of Jesus Christ can be summarized the point that Jesus is Christ, but Christ is not Jesus alone. Although Ryu’s understanding of Jesus Christi is one of the good examples for doing Korean indigenous theology, we should keenly aware the point that his understanding of Jesus Christ is not the same as a doctrinal assertion of Christology.
목차
Ⅰ. 여는 글 : 다석 종교 사상의 위치와 그 중요성
Ⅱ. 다석이 이해한 예수 그리스도: 나(제나와 얼나), 예수 그리스도, 종교관을 중심으로
Ⅲ. 다석의 예수 그리스도 이해에 대한 비판적 고찰
Ⅳ. 나가는 글: 다석 사상에 대한 비판적 수용을 제안하면서
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0