메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jee-Won Hahn (Pukyong National University)
저널정보
사단법인 한국언어학회 언어학 언어학 제63권
발행연도
2012.8
수록면
109 - 129 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The purpose of the study was to identify factors that affect the perception of politeness in the act of apologizing. A perception task has been employed for Korean apologies. The potential apologies are presented to native speakers of Korean in order to see how such utterances are perceived by native speakers. Responses to apology events are analyzed in two ways: quantitatively and qualitatively. The choice of apologies over non-apologies is calculated for their perception of politeness. This study analyzed three aspects: apology strategies, use of performatives, and situational variables. The stimuli used for the perception task were selected based on data from a previous study. A total of ten items were used in order to elicit responses from Korean native speakers. The degree of politeness was calculated based on how the given apology item had been interpreted. If the items were perceived to be sincere and appropriate for the context, participants were likely to choose apologies over non-apologies and vice versa. Such choices are presented in percentages for politeness. This study demonstrates the role of linguistic strategies and performatives in apologies. The choice of linguistic strategies is found to affect the degree of politeness that people perceive. Among others, different strategies are classified as other-oriented politeness. Furthermore, the degree of politeness also varies according to the presence of performatives. Additional findings come from metalinguistic views on apologetic utterances. .Native interpretations of apologetic utterances provide comments that reflect views on situational variation.

목차

Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature review
3. Methods
4. Analysis of apology events
5. Results
6. Summary and further research
References

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-700-002664077