메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
박영식 (초당대학교)
저널정보
한국관광레저학회 관광레저연구 관광레저연구 제25권 제8호(통권 제79호)
발행연도
2013.11
수록면
409 - 424 (16page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study was carried out to understand the comparative important and priorities of evaluation factors considered when guest select air brands using the AHP method. Items for the setting priority were decided as "produce", "service quality", "promotion", and ‘reliability‘" by council. Sampling in this study is limited to the people who has majored in tourism, air management and CEO of tourism industries. The responders included 27. Date were analyzed by frequency, and AHP. As the results, "product" was decided as a most important item. "types and period of airplanes" evaluated as that of first priority in the totality evaluation items. Results of priority analysis of four competing airline brands showed that ‘Jeju Air" was most preferred brand, "Air Busan" was second, "Asiana Airline" was third, and "Korean Airline" was fourth one. Thus the competitive advantage evaluation would be able to show us which attributes of each brand has evaluation priority form its guest, so these evaluation process would be also useful to marketers of the airline.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구분석의 결과
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (45)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2014-320-003418344