지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper aimed to considering the meanings of literary phenomenons in the early 1920"s socialist journals by the synchronic view point. In other words, this study want to examine the characteristics of literary theories and poetic practices which had been appeared in socialist journal KongChe (共濟), ASung(我聲), and ShinSeangWhal(新生活). For it could be exposed when it was observed in synchronic cultural contexts.
The persons who had published the literary theory in them were generally socialist. They actively participated in the process of publishing it. For them, emotion was one of the most important feature which must be equipped in literary works. However, they never thinking that all sorts of emotion are important. Instead, they thought that socially meaningful emotion is very important. They also regarding that personality is necessary to a literary works. But it was also the social personality rather than individual personality. And it could be realized through social liberation from the structural absurdities of capitalist society. Therefore, for them art or literature was what means the state of liberation. They called it for “aestheticization of life”.
The phases of poetic practice in socialist journals might be divided into two directions. The one is the aspect that socialist literary theories were applied in writing poetry by a socialist. It was then to reconcile romanticism with sociality. The other is the aspect that diverse poetry coexisting in the socialist journals. The fundamental reason why diverse poetry were coexisted in it was because the socialist literary theories had a liberal structure. For this reason, the journals could accommodate ‘art for art’s sake’ as well as socialist poetry together.
The persons who had published the literary theory in them were generally socialist. They actively participated in the process of publishing it. For them, emotion was one of the most important feature which must be equipped in literary works. However, they never thinking that all sorts of emotion are important. Instead, they thought that socially meaningful emotion is very important. They also regarding that personality is necessary to a literary works. But it was also the social personality rather than individual personality. And it could be realized through social liberation from the structural absurdities of capitalist society. Therefore, for them art or literature was what means the state of liberation. They called it for “aestheticization of life”.
The phases of poetic practice in socialist journals might be divided into two directions. The one is the aspect that socialist literary theories were applied in writing poetry by a socialist. It was then to reconcile romanticism with sociality. The other is the aspect that diverse poetry coexisting in the socialist journals. The fundamental reason why diverse poetry were coexisted in it was because the socialist literary theories had a liberal structure. For this reason, the journals could accommodate ‘art for art’s sake’ as well as socialist poetry together.
#1920년대 초기
#사회주의
#사회주의운동가
#사회주의 경향 잡지
#『공제』
#『아성』
#『신생활』
#문예론
#감정
#개성
#예술을 위한 예술
#시적 실천
#낭만성
#사회성
#the early 1920's
#socialism
#socialist
#socialist journal
#KongChe(共濟)
#ASung(我聲)
#ShinSeangWhal(新生活)
#literary theory
#emotion
#personality
#art for art's sake
#poetic practice
#romanticism
#sociality
목차
1. 서론
2. 사회주의경향 잡지 문예론의 구조
3. 사회주의경향 잡지의 시적 실천 양상
4. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
1930년대 모더니즘 문학과 도시의 정신생활
이수형
현대소설연구
2014
.08
일제말기 이효석 소설에 나타난 ‘할빈’의 의미 : <화분>, <벽공무한>, <하얼빈>을 중심으로
한홍화
국어국문학
2013
.08
1930년대 장편소설에 나타난 고향의식 : 이기영 『고향』, 강경애 『인간문제』, 한설야 『황혼』을 중심으로
우수영
국어국문학
2013
.08
중산층 가정의 욕망과 존재방식 : 박완서의 『휘청거리는 오후』론
오자은
국어국문학
2013
.08
신파, ‘비절쾌절悲絶快絶’ 극의 탄생 : 이상협의 <눈물>을 중심으로
백현미
국어국문학
2013
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001020116