지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 202 - 205 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
With increased interests in design in recent years, design practices began to be assessed by measures for ethics both inside and outside the design community. Ethical approaches to design date back to the 1970s; then it was only a matter of design professionals. Yet, it indeed was during this period that the ethics of design and designers arose as a subject of concern. Hence, the recent interests in design ethics can be viewed in this historical context and as a matter that has been expanded to become a public issue by being conflated with enhanced social responsibilities of design.
It is necessary to pay attention to this phenomenon because it reflects changing social demands of design. In other words, major criteria of design assessment have shifted from industrial qualities?suggesting new life styles, increasing productivity and product value?to ethical qualities. Accordingly, a majority of design discourses are now based on cultural or anthropological researches including Human-centered Design rather than scientific researches such as design methodologies or design semantics. On the one hand, these changes provide us with a ground upon which to discuss design as a cultural and/or social practice. On the other hand, such tendency makes a negative impact on designers, by suppressing a potential active movement of the design community to engage with social issues. Furthermore, this could provoke the internalization and de-politicization of design, thereby limiting the design practice to an act of charity e.g. helping the third world countries or Talent Donation. Thus, it is required to examine the socio-cultural background of ethical assessment of design and to make a critical analysis of the meanings/implications of ethical criteria in contemporary design.
It is necessary to pay attention to this phenomenon because it reflects changing social demands of design. In other words, major criteria of design assessment have shifted from industrial qualities?suggesting new life styles, increasing productivity and product value?to ethical qualities. Accordingly, a majority of design discourses are now based on cultural or anthropological researches including Human-centered Design rather than scientific researches such as design methodologies or design semantics. On the one hand, these changes provide us with a ground upon which to discuss design as a cultural and/or social practice. On the other hand, such tendency makes a negative impact on designers, by suppressing a potential active movement of the design community to engage with social issues. Furthermore, this could provoke the internalization and de-politicization of design, thereby limiting the design practice to an act of charity e.g. helping the third world countries or Talent Donation. Thus, it is required to examine the socio-cultural background of ethical assessment of design and to make a critical analysis of the meanings/implications of ethical criteria in contemporary design.
목차
Abstract
1 개요
2 디자인에 대한 가치 평가의 변화
3 디자인에 대한 도덕적 논쟁
4 도덕적 가치 평가의 배경
5 도덕적 가치 평가가 지닌 문제점
6 결론
References
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
서울시 공공디자인 정책분석으로 본 공공디자인연구 : 2008-2010년 디자인서울총괄본부 사업을 중심으로
김현석
,
이수정
,
장유리
외 1명
Archives of Design Research
2012
.08
엔조마리의 Autoprogettazione에 기초한 스툴 디자인 연구
윤홍기
,
김상규
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2014
.05
스마트 기술과 현명한 삶의 상관관계 : 그래서 우리는 스마트해졌는가?
김경선
,
김상규
ASIA DESIGN JOURNAL
2011
.11
한국의 디자인유산 연구 : 현대 일상생활 도구를 중심으로
김상규
Archives of Design Research
2012
.08
디자인에 대한 도덕적 접근 및 가치 평가 비판
김상규
Archives of Design Research
2016
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0