인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study was to investigate the change in motion and the load distribution between the front and back squat. With these purposes in consideration, 7 experienced weight lifters peformed both front and back squat. In order to analyze the change in motion and the load distribution of the two types of squat the following variables, ankle joint angle, knee joint angle, body angle, foot pressure, muscle activity using the 3D motion system, foot pressure system and EMG wireless system were compared. Here are the following results. Firtst, for the front squat ankle joint angle at event 2 was smaller but knee joint angle was between the two types of squat there was no significant difference. Second, foot pressure for all phases was no significant difference. Third, all of the phases the Upper muscle EMG values were higher while preforming the front squat. All things considered, the change in motion and the load distribution are different depending on the squat type. It is concluded that the front squat is effective exercise for developing overall muscles and the back squat is go여 for developing the quadriceps strengthening and the stability of upper body.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-690-001009406
