지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper challenges to the consensus of the old definitions and categories of Gnosticism before Nag Hammad discovery and suggests some practical way how approach to define a concept of Gnosticism and how to categorize Gnostic literature. As Karen L. King’s suggestion. the old consensus were used in terms of anti-Catholic Protestant polemic, anti-Judaism and colonial ideology. Furthermore, not only the origin of gnostic literature are not unity at all. This paper shows some examples which is not agree old consensus of the definition of gnosticism through uncovers and compares the similarities and differences among some major traditional gnostic literature. In conclusion, the old definition of gnosticism should be reconsidered without orthodoxy-heretic polemic and dogmatic theology, and the category of gnosticism should be reshaped in detail.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 영지주의의 근대적 의미
Ⅲ. 근대적 영지주의 개념의 모호성 대한 예증들
Ⅳ. 새로운 시도들
Ⅴ. 결론적 이야기와 제언
참고문헌
참고문헌 (24)
참고문헌 신청
최병수 / 2013 / 초대교회와 도마복음: 영지주의 구원으로서 영혼의 혼례식 / 도서출판 아우름
Arnal, William E. / 1995 / the Rhetoric of Marginality: Apocalypticism, Gnosticism, and Sayings Gospel / HTR 88(4):471~494
Barnstone, Willis / 2003 / The Gnostic Bible / Shambhala
Bultmann, Rudolf / 1963 / History of the Synoptic Tradition / Hendrickson Publisher
Casey, Robert P. / The Study of Gnosticism / Journal of Theological Studies 36
Arnal, William E. / 1995 / the Rhetoric of Marginality: Apocalypticism, Gnosticism, and Sayings Gospel / HTR 88(4):471~494
Barnstone, Willis / 2003 / The Gnostic Bible / Shambhala
Bultmann, Rudolf / 1963 / History of the Synoptic Tradition / Hendrickson Publisher
Casey, Robert P. / The Study of Gnosticism / Journal of Theological Studies 36
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-000983387