개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.12
- 수록면
- 134 - 138 (5page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate role of palliative laparoscopic colorectal resection for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis.
Methods: We reviewed 248 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent palliative bowel resection of the primary tumor during the period from January 2008 to December 2010 at Asan Medical Center. The short-term and oncologic outcomes of those with laparoscopic resection were reviewed and comparison was made between patients with laparoscopic and open resection.
Results: A total of 248 patients were identified and of these patients, 50 underwent laparoscopic resection and conversion was required in six patients (12.0%). There was no differences in the gender, age, the location of primary tumor. But in the open group, peritoneal seeding was more (31.8% vs. 14.3%) and lung metastasis was less (28.3% vs. 48.0%; P=0.023) than laparoscopic group. The length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (10.4 days vs. 6.7 days; P=0.048), and the postoperative complications were no significant difference in the both groups (13.1% vs. 8.0%; P=0.466) The overall survivals were similar in the both groups (mean survival, 758 days vs. 851 days; P=0.278).
Conclusion: Considering of the patient’s general condition and distant metastasis, laparoscopic palliative bowel resection for stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis is effective and safe.
Methods: We reviewed 248 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer who underwent palliative bowel resection of the primary tumor during the period from January 2008 to December 2010 at Asan Medical Center. The short-term and oncologic outcomes of those with laparoscopic resection were reviewed and comparison was made between patients with laparoscopic and open resection.
Results: A total of 248 patients were identified and of these patients, 50 underwent laparoscopic resection and conversion was required in six patients (12.0%). There was no differences in the gender, age, the location of primary tumor. But in the open group, peritoneal seeding was more (31.8% vs. 14.3%) and lung metastasis was less (28.3% vs. 48.0%; P=0.023) than laparoscopic group. The length of postoperative hospital stay in the laparoscopic group was significantly shorter than that in the open group (10.4 days vs. 6.7 days; P=0.048), and the postoperative complications were no significant difference in the both groups (13.1% vs. 8.0%; P=0.466) The overall survivals were similar in the both groups (mean survival, 758 days vs. 851 days; P=0.278).
Conclusion: Considering of the patient’s general condition and distant metastasis, laparoscopic palliative bowel resection for stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastasis is effective and safe.
목차
서론
방법
결과
REFERENCES
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-510-001101464