메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
연구보고서
저자정보
안기정 (서울연구원) 고준호 (서울연구원)
저널정보
서울연구원 서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서 정책연구보고서 2012-32
발행연도
2012.10
수록면
1 - 182 (182page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In Seoul, congestion toll is collected at Namsan Tunnel 1 and 3 as a part of the transportation demand management (TDM) to ease the traffic congestion in downtown area since 1996. As the congestion toll policy has been implemented for 16 years, social interests grow on the re-evaluation of its effectiveness on the congestion mitigation and toll level.
During the initial period of the policy implementation in 1996, the traffic volume decreased to 25% for both tunnels, however traffic volume gradually increased and has now approached about 97% prior to the implementation. Accordingly, there is a need for a detailed review on such as improvements and effectiveness about road pricing policy in Namsan Tunnel 1 and 3.
In addition as the same amount of 2,000 won has been levied since the policy implementation in 1996, there are needs for determining the validity of the toll scheme, toll levels and range of vehicle exemption.
In this research, evaluation of the congestion pricing policy through quantitative analysis is conducted. Improvement for enhancing effectiveness of the congestion fee policy and the direction of future developments are derived.
The congestion pricing policy has influenced the traffic volume reduction. However, the degree of its effect on the current traffic flow has decreased as the price level has remained same for 16 years.
The congestion pricing policy has decreased the user cost when it was compared with the social cost while social welfare has increased. However the degrees of its effects are diminishing
External costs for Namsan tunnel 1 and 3 due to congestion are large, which indicates that it is necessary to adjust the level of the current congestion fee rates. Variable pricing is necessary to enforce the Namsan Tunnel 1, and the bi-directional congestion toll system is sought to be a reasonable.
Results on the analysis of the adequacy of the vehicle exemption shows that taxi, green car, one week day-off car and small-sized car should be recommended. To attract the use of current exempted cars, it is desirable to maintain the current exemption system for the time being.
It is sought to be that the expansion of congestion toll range should include the Hangang-ro road as the traffic congestion cost is much larger than other bypass roads of Namsan tunnels. Finally, the effect of line-based congestion pricing system is limited to decrease volume, so it is necessary to switch to the area based congestion tolling.

목차

[표지]
[표제지]
[요약 및 정책건의]
[목차]
표목차
그림목차
[제1장 연구의 개요]
제1절 연구의 배경 및 목적
제2절 연구의 내용 및 체계
[제2장 혼잡통행료제도의 의의 및 해외사례]
제1절 의의 및 이론적 근거
제2절 해외사례
[제3장 남산1ㆍ3호터널 혼잡통행료제도의 현황]
제1절 실시개요
제2절 통행량 변화
제3절 통행속도의 변화
제4절 차종별 구성비 변화
제5절 요금수입의 변화
[제4장 혼잡통행료제도의 효과 평가방법 및 내용]
제1절 평가내용
제2절 평가방법
[제5장 혼잡통행료제도의 효과평가]
제1절 통행량 증감에 미치는 영향
제2절 이용자 편익에 미치는 영향
제3절 사회적 비용 감소
제4절 재정기여도
[제6장 혼잡통행료제도의 쟁점사항 및 개선과제]
제1절 요금수준의 개선
제2절 요금체계의 개선
제3절 양 방향 징수에 대한 고찰
제4절 면제차량 범위의 축소
제5절 대안적 혼잡통행료제도의 검토
[제7장 결론 및 정책건의]
제1절 분석결과의 요약
제2절 정책적 제언
[참고문헌]
[부록]
[영문요약(Abstract)]

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-350-001102476