지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2013.10
- 수록면
- 331 - 349 (19page)
이용수
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)
- 이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
- 연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
- 이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This is a Study for criticism about Park Pil-Ju’s the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming. He was the typical positive Confucian scholar of Yi Dan Sang line in the 18th century, which has multiple awareness. He firmly criticized the wide-spread impression that doctrines of Wang Yang-ming.
First of all, Park Pil-Ju criticized that the investigation of things(格物) of Wang Yang-ming is ‘transcendence of study level’ and ‘development of self-discipline’. It is different from the investigation of things(格物), which criticized leaving out inception of procedure and principles. Therefore, it make a mistake the investigation of things(格物) is not able to find the object of study. Also criticized that there is no demarcation between Knowledge(知) and Action(行) in The unity of knowledge and action(知行合一). Park Pil-Ju consisted that both theory and practice should be combined through Knowledge(知) and Action(行). It is also lopsided view of theory, because it adhere to not separating(不離) position about ‘the mind is principle(心卽理)’ In other words, Wang Su-In asserted the ‘limited area’, ‘the mind is principle(心卽理)’ is ‘mind’ makes unification error. This is separated the object. Finally, he also had criticism about innate knowledge (良知). Innate knowledge plays judgement dispute role in every situation, but it is not able to separated from principle of object.
Criticism the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming of Park Pil-Ju intend as checks but also performing adherence to Neo-Confucianism. In the middle of 18th century, this philosophy development intended to solve the various problems through criticism the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming under the rapidly period to latter period Chosun Dynasty.
First of all, Park Pil-Ju criticized that the investigation of things(格物) of Wang Yang-ming is ‘transcendence of study level’ and ‘development of self-discipline’. It is different from the investigation of things(格物), which criticized leaving out inception of procedure and principles. Therefore, it make a mistake the investigation of things(格物) is not able to find the object of study. Also criticized that there is no demarcation between Knowledge(知) and Action(行) in The unity of knowledge and action(知行合一). Park Pil-Ju consisted that both theory and practice should be combined through Knowledge(知) and Action(行). It is also lopsided view of theory, because it adhere to not separating(不離) position about ‘the mind is principle(心卽理)’ In other words, Wang Su-In asserted the ‘limited area’, ‘the mind is principle(心卽理)’ is ‘mind’ makes unification error. This is separated the object. Finally, he also had criticism about innate knowledge (良知). Innate knowledge plays judgement dispute role in every situation, but it is not able to separated from principle of object.
Criticism the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming of Park Pil-Ju intend as checks but also performing adherence to Neo-Confucianism. In the middle of 18th century, this philosophy development intended to solve the various problems through criticism the doctrines of Wang Yang-ming under the rapidly period to latter period Chosun Dynasty.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 왕수인의 ‘格物工夫’에 대한 문제와 비판
Ⅲ. 왕수인의 ‘知行合一’에 대한 문제와 비판
Ⅳ. 왕수인의 ‘心卽理’에 대한 문제와 비판
Ⅴ. 왕수인의 ‘良知’에 대한 문제와 비판
Ⅵ. 나오는 말
〈참고문헌〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-150-001250804