메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강돈구 (한국학중앙연구원)
저널정보
한국종교학회 종교연구 종교연구 70집
발행연도
2013.3
수록면
97 - 127 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Discourses on ‘national studies’ have taken place in three North Asian countries from early on. This paper examines the current discourses on ‘national studies’ in the academia in these countries and points out their peculiarities in Korea where some religious groups have played a role in ‘the national studies.’
With regard to the contents of ‘the national studies’, Japanese scholars focus on Shinto and Chinese ones on Confucianism. However, Koreans identify ‘the national studies’ as Korean studies or they relate them to Confucianism. Unlike Japan and China, Korea assumes that a goal of ‘the national studies’ is the establishment of a national identity, so Korean scholars have failed to reach an agreement on the concepts and contents of ‘the national studies.’ Instead, some religious groups set a goal of pursuing a national identity, try to define the concepts and contents of ‘the national studies’ and promote ‘national studies movement’.
Daejonggyo and Danworld are religious groups that actively participate in the ‘national studies movement’ in Korea. This paper states that the ‘national studies’ mentioned by Daejonggyo are Daejonggyo itself, and the ‘national studies’ indicated by Danworld are Danworld itself.
This paper also notes that the religious groups like Daejonggyo and Danworld in Korea are actively involved in the recent ‘national studies movement’, which is an important factor to understand the current shape of Korean religions.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 동아시아의 국학
Ⅲ. 한국 종교교단의 `국학 운동`
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (60)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-200-001212576