지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Ever since the KAAB was established in 2006, lots of architecture programs have received its accreditation. There have been found benefits and disadvantages of the architectural accreditation. This paper starts with the benefits and disadvantages and further discusses the architectural education which has undergone fundamental changes after the introduction of the professional degree program and its accreditation. It also deals with and clarifies the three misunderstandings about the accreditation: (1) curricula are unnecessarily unified; (2) there is a fundamental blockage for the junior college graduates to become architects; and (3) only professional schools of architecture can confer professional master degree in architecture. The paper then criticizes the philosophy and purpose of the general university evaluation currently done by government. Finally the paper suggests the architectural accreditation system be constantly improved through sufficient discussion among educators, architects, students and government officials.
목차
서론
건축학전문학위 및 인증제도 도입 후 달라진 교육현장
인증에 대한 3가지 오해
인증제도의 미래 발전 방향
대학평가와 인증
결언
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0