메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
刘鑫民 (复旦大学)
저널정보
한국중어중문학회 중어중문학 中語中文學 第56輯
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
599 - 618 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Vocabulary acquisition is the most important factor of second language acquisition and it is the core of the whole process of language learning. There is a close relationship between Chinese language learners" vocabulary ability and the dimensions and compactness of word association in the learners" mental lexicon. So, the study of dimensions, range and compactness of word association in the learners" mental lexicon can reveal the depth of learners" vocabulary acquisition and the ability of leaners" vocabulary output. The study observed the differences between the Chinese language learners of Korean and native speakers of Chinese in the dimensions, range and compactness of word connection in their mental lexicon by an association experiment. It also studied the influence of word association dimensions and compactness on the accessibility of words in the mental lexicon. Experimental statistics shows that those subjects who are native speakers of Chinese have stronger accessibility of target words than the Korean subjects for more than two times. From the perspective of pattern and range of word association, the symptomatic association and paradigmatic association in the mental lexicon of the native speakers is obviously stronger than that of the Korean subjects but the native speakers’ encyclopedia knowledge association is weaker. Meanwhile in the paradigmatic association, the synonym association and antonym association of the native speakers’mental lexicon is much stronger than that of the Korean subjects. What’s more, Korean subjects failed to build any association with 17.5% of the total tested words while for Chinese subjects the number is zero. Among the strongest association, the encyclopedia association of Korean subjects is stronger than Chinese subjects but their symptomatic association and paradigmatic association are weaker than Chinese subjects. Based on the above analysis of the experimental statistics, we can conclude that the reason why the word extraction ability(accessibility) of Korean Chinese learner is not as strong as the native speaker is that the symptomatic association and paradigmatic association of the Korean subjects’ mental lexicon are not well-developed. On this basis, the revelation of word association research to vocabulary teaching is discussed.

목차

1. ?言
2. 理?假??硏究目?
3. ??方法
4. ???果分析
5. ???敎????的啓示
【參考文獻】
【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0