지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 5%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This article examines how recognitions of the interrelation between modern civilization and violence have been linked to the theories of J. Galtung, W. Benjamin, H. Arendt and S. Zizek, and investigates their relationships and its meaning. Galtung’s concept of ‘structural violence’ made it possible to criticize institutionalized violence during the civilizing process but it did not challenge the normality of civilization including the legitimacy of state??monopolized violence. The concept is closely related to the (implementable) policy??oriented characteristics of peace studies. On the other hand, the concept of ‘violence’ in the theories of Benjamin, Arendt and Zizek confronts the commonly accepted modern idea of violence where civilization and violence construct an antithetic relationship. Their reflections on violence ‘by’ modern structures or systems such as the law, political power, capitalistic economic system, etc., inevitably lead to issues of counter??violence ‘against’ them. But duality of violence, or aporia constructed by interrelationships between violence and counter-violence is not fully explained; it is impossible simply to apply these theories to the extremely complicated violent reality of this era of globalization. Nevertheless, new speculation on the impossible possibility ‘which these theories try to show’ should continue.
목차
1. 서론
2. 갈퉁의 폭력론: ‘구조적 폭력’ 개념을 둘러싼 논란들
3. 벤야민의 「폭력 비판을 위하여」와 그 현대적 변주들
4. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (42)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001375353