지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This thesis aims to analyze The Freedom of the City focusing on the confederacy among state apparatuses and their public discourses that distort and exaggerate the experienced reality of the disprivileged citizens in Derry―Skinner, Lily, and Michael―and their violent impacts on them. Many readings of this play tend to oversimplify it as a Nationalist political play by regarding it solely as a product of a historical event of Bloody Sunday. However, it is revealed that Brian Friel broadens his scope by approaching the broader issues of authority or power―political, judicial, moral―and its discourses in the context of Northern Ireland’s social, political, and cultural issues, and reveals how language and discourse manipulate and destroy individuals.
The empowered figures in this play, those ‘outside’ the Guildhall, seek to manage ideological discourse. In a sense, the discourses of those figures rather than the figures themselves are the real protagonists of this play. On the other hand, three victims, those ‘inside’ the Guildhall, appear as hapless victims of the discourses of power. The various official discourses of the empowered frame the activities of the hapless trio in the mayor’s parlor, determine the course of their lives, and collaborate to snuff out that existence to suit their purpose. As a result, the trio become the casuality of language and also fall victim to political, social, economic and judicial injustice of greater force in Northern Ireland.
The public discourses represented by a Judge, Soldiers, Police Constable, Brigadier, Army Press Officer, Forensic Expert, Pathologist, Priest, Balladeer, TV news commentator, and a sociologist Dr. Dodds, seem to be ideologically disparate, yet they reveal their mutual confederacy. They assume allegiance to the British government or other forces that implicitly take its side. And even those that seem to sympathize with the Irish victims also show allegiance to the British power. They all foster the official view and elevate the level of fear with exaggeration and distortion.
The empowered figures in this play, those ‘outside’ the Guildhall, seek to manage ideological discourse. In a sense, the discourses of those figures rather than the figures themselves are the real protagonists of this play. On the other hand, three victims, those ‘inside’ the Guildhall, appear as hapless victims of the discourses of power. The various official discourses of the empowered frame the activities of the hapless trio in the mayor’s parlor, determine the course of their lives, and collaborate to snuff out that existence to suit their purpose. As a result, the trio become the casuality of language and also fall victim to political, social, economic and judicial injustice of greater force in Northern Ireland.
The public discourses represented by a Judge, Soldiers, Police Constable, Brigadier, Army Press Officer, Forensic Expert, Pathologist, Priest, Balladeer, TV news commentator, and a sociologist Dr. Dodds, seem to be ideologically disparate, yet they reveal their mutual confederacy. They assume allegiance to the British government or other forces that implicitly take its side. And even those that seem to sympathize with the Irish victims also show allegiance to the British power. They all foster the official view and elevate the level of fear with exaggeration and distortion.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 국가장치들의 제휴와 공모
Ⅲ. 공적 담론에 숨겨진 권력
Ⅳ. 담론의 희생자들: 주검에서 죽음으로
Ⅴ. 나가는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
초기 아나뱁티스트 운동과 종교자유 사상 : Balthasar Hubmaier의 사상을 중심으로
남병두
장신논단
2019
.03
마틴 루터의 『그리스도인의 자유』에 대한 이해(Ⅱ)
박상봉
신학정론
2018
.12
사회계약론의 풀리지 않는 문제와 사회계약론의 자연화
박종준
철학연구
2017
.08
마틴 루터의 『그리스도인의 자유』에 대한 이해 (Ⅰ)
박상봉
신학정론
2018
.06
이해(Understanding)’와 ‘생활사(Everyday life)’로서의 정치사상사 연구 : 와타나베 히로시(渡辺浩), 『일본정치사상사: 17-19세기』에 대한 논평
김영수
한국동양정치사상사연구
2018
.03
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-001-001373993