메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최공호 (韓國傳統文化大學校)
저널정보
한국미술연구소 미술사논단 美術史論壇 第37號
발행연도
2013.12
수록면
177 - 193 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Wuhyng Go Yuseop (1905-1944) is ranked as a father first establishing foundation of Korean art history and aesthetics. Despite of his short 40-year life, his achievements, considering poor research conditions that time, are amazingly profound and extensive enough to compare to those of today.
Characteristics of Go Yuseop’s tradition awareness, as suggested in “Peculiarities in Korean art are soon tradition of Korean art,” are that it is deeply interrelated to aesthetic consciousness. Even though he did not directly mention the tradition or borrow the form of its discourse, people can somewhat discover evidences of his traditional awareness by tracing the context of his writings and aesthetic consciousness.
The core of Go Yuseop’s traditional awareness can be his viewpoint focusing on Buddhist art and historical background before Goryeo Dynasty. It is pointed out as limitation of the times and the person himself that he considered Goryeo Dynasty as the classic of tradition and Joseon Dynasty as disgraceful period with the tradition declined. It is because his relatively little attention to Joseon with recognizing Joseon as the reason of state’s collapse cannot be definitely viewed separately from recognition of Japanese national scholars. In addition, theories of Dharma-kaya(法身) and Nirmana-kaya(應身) are important keyword to understand the basis of his traditional awareness. The concepts of Dharma-kaya and Nirmana-kaya which borrow the form of tritheism(三神論) to classify the tradition as an unchangeable value and as varying element depending on time and environment are still in use of the academic world today long after Go Yuseops time.
Though Go Yuseop is respected as the father of Korean art history, his personal and historical limitations are clearly not inconsiderable. Go Yuseop’s lifetime and the period of his activity is exactly the same with the historically unfortune, other-directed ear. As an intellectual who lived an unhappy life in the modern period, he would have shouldered too much heavy responsibility as an individual who first stepped into the fields of art history and aesthetics. It would be the manifestation of national consciousness and Go Yuseop would have been repeatedly tormented between colonial knowledge systems absorbed through academic frames along with actual issues of the nation that he recognized himself even without realizing it.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 고유섭의 학문과 전통론의 특징
Ⅲ. 고유섭의 전통 인식
Ⅳ. 고유섭 전통 인식의 성과와 한계
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-600-001354482