메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
강규한 (국민대)
저널정보
문학과환경학회 문학과환경 문학과환경 제13권 1호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
11 - 31 (21page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
According to Aldo Leopold, the homopocentric approach to nature is limited and biased and therefore man’s role should be changed from conqueror of the land community to a plain member and citizen of it. This is why we should need biocentric understanding of ecosystem and a new moral called ‘land ethic’ clearly demonstrated in his A Sand County Almanac. Land ethic assumes that the boundary of ethic has been extended from white men to non-white women and also has to get into non-human beings in the land community. A focus of the ethic is laid on the ecosystem network of the land community rather than its individual members. The ethic asserts that it is right to tend to preserve the integrity, stability and beauty of the biotic community while it is wrong to tend otherwise. Clearly, it is not the individual organism that attracts moral consideration, but the community as a whole. Too heavy stress on the wholeness of the community would lead to the risk of a totalitarian perspective or ecofascism. It is also argued that the integral, stable ecological wholeness can be found only in the theoretical models, not in the reality.
We need to be reminded, however, that Leopold’s A Sand County Almanac aims to inspire us with a new moral for our environment in danger rather than to present any scientific ecological theories or models. Furthermore, the book demonstrates that he has a deep affinity with other individual non-human beings. He pays a great respect to each member as well as the community as a whole. He is hard to be labelled as ‘totalitarian’ although he accepts as one of its working principles the food-chain mechanism in which one member is eaten and served as energy source of another member. It is also noteworthy he is one of the rare professional scientist among the nature writers and that his land ethic admits the benefits of modernity and the inevitability of human intervention. Using the scientific ecological discourses, he tires to provide a revolutionary ethic for environmental preservation. At the same time, he keeps his balance admitting the basic necessity of modern technology.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-001687566