지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2014.6
- 수록면
- 45 - 94 (50page)
- DOI
- 10.35505/sjlb.2014.06.4.1.45
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The outside director institution, a company law for ensuring company management transparency, is not functioning in its purpose. The main cause seems to be that the majority of outside directors are chosen by recommendation from controlling shareholders or managements so that an actual independence of the outside director is not established.
A way for the institutional investor to take part in and check the election process so that the outside director independent from controlling shareholders or managements will be chosen to ensure the functionality of the outside director institution will be explored.
The election process for an outside director, when classified by its candidate recommendation process and the election process at shareholders meeting, needs an application of the outside director labor pool in relation to recommending the outside director candidate by the institutional investor, and also needs an application of national pension that will lead and remind the necessity of the unity between the institutional investors in relation to exercising the shareholder voting right by the institutional investors.
Traditionally, institutional investors have been reluctant to engage in company management. Recently, the expansion of the role of institutional investors and the elimination of legal restrictions on shareholder voting rights aided in establishing the basis for the institutional investors to engage more actively in company management.
Engaging in the outside director election process can be approached in a similar light, and for this to happen ratio of share holdings needs to be expanded, for the institutional investors to maintain long term stocks investment issues expiration needs to be elongated, and ways to elongate the evaluation process of fund managers should be established.
Moreover, proxy needs to be utilized actively in order to make up for the lacking ratio in shareholders meeting, and obligating cumulative voting, dispersing the shareholders meeting open period, and etc. are needed as countermeasures as well.
A way for the institutional investor to take part in and check the election process so that the outside director independent from controlling shareholders or managements will be chosen to ensure the functionality of the outside director institution will be explored.
The election process for an outside director, when classified by its candidate recommendation process and the election process at shareholders meeting, needs an application of the outside director labor pool in relation to recommending the outside director candidate by the institutional investor, and also needs an application of national pension that will lead and remind the necessity of the unity between the institutional investors in relation to exercising the shareholder voting right by the institutional investors.
Traditionally, institutional investors have been reluctant to engage in company management. Recently, the expansion of the role of institutional investors and the elimination of legal restrictions on shareholder voting rights aided in establishing the basis for the institutional investors to engage more actively in company management.
Engaging in the outside director election process can be approached in a similar light, and for this to happen ratio of share holdings needs to be expanded, for the institutional investors to maintain long term stocks investment issues expiration needs to be elongated, and ways to elongate the evaluation process of fund managers should be established.
Moreover, proxy needs to be utilized actively in order to make up for the lacking ratio in shareholders meeting, and obligating cumulative voting, dispersing the shareholders meeting open period, and etc. are needed as countermeasures as well.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 기관투자자의 현황과 지위
Ⅲ. 사외이사 선임에 있어서 기관투자자의 역할
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (33)
참고문헌 신청
1. [단행본] - Robert B. Clark / 1986 / Corporate Law / Little Brown & Co. : 390 ~
2. [단행본] - D. Solomon / 1994 / Coporate Law and Policy / West
3. [단행본] - O'kelley / 1992 / Corporation and other business associations / Little Brown & Co.
4. [단행본] - Margaret M. Blair / 1995 / Ownership and Control / The Brookings Institution
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Ronald J. Gilson / 1981 / A structural approach to corporations : A Cast against Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers / Stan. L. Rev 33 : 819 ~
2. [단행본] - D. Solomon / 1994 / Coporate Law and Policy / West
3. [단행본] - O'kelley / 1992 / Corporation and other business associations / Little Brown & Co.
4. [단행본] - Margaret M. Blair / 1995 / Ownership and Control / The Brookings Institution
5. [학술지(정기간행물)] - Ronald J. Gilson / 1981 / A structural approach to corporations : A Cast against Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers / Stan. L. Rev 33 : 819 ~
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-001623469