메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(전남대학교) (경북대학교)
저널정보
한양법학회 한양법학 한양법학 제46집
오류 신고하기

피인용 3

검색

    초록·키워드

    As a result of checking constitutional issues, the conclusion is that (1) The opinion that holding chairman of National science and technology council of president is unconstitutional because that is against Constitution of the republic of Korea, Article 83 (a ban for holding more than one office) and invasion of the overall supervision right of Prime Minister, is not convincing. (2) but codes those are apprehended that transubstantiate the council to intrinsic administrative agency, are must be improved.
    In course of constitutional adjudication, if some legislation has two conflicting aspects (constitutional and unconstitutional), that must be interpreted constitutional because of the principle that presume legislation to be constitutional. And the desirability of policy like this is not the subject of judical judgement but the subject of legislator. These things considered, installing National science and technology council under president and holding chairman of National science and technology council(NSTC) of president is not unconstitutional on the assumption the the revised bill must be improved. But questions remain about whether the act like this is desirable or nor in aspect of consitutional policy. Therefore National Assembly as the representative of policy must earnestly answer the question.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484080