인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
As a result of checking constitutional issues, the conclusion is that (1) The opinion that holding chairman of National science and technology council of president is unconstitutional because that is against Constitution of the republic of Korea, Article 83 (a ban for holding more than one office) and invasion of the overall supervision right of Prime Minister, is not convincing. (2) but codes those are apprehended that transubstantiate the council to intrinsic administrative agency, are must be improved.
In course of constitutional adjudication, if some legislation has two conflicting aspects (constitutional and unconstitutional), that must be interpreted constitutional because of the principle that presume legislation to be constitutional. And the desirability of policy like this is not the subject of judical judgement but the subject of legislator. These things considered, installing National science and technology council under president and holding chairman of National science and technology council(NSTC) of president is not unconstitutional on the assumption the the revised bill must be improved. But questions remain about whether the act like this is desirable or nor in aspect of consitutional policy. Therefore National Assembly as the representative of policy must earnestly answer the question.
In course of constitutional adjudication, if some legislation has two conflicting aspects (constitutional and unconstitutional), that must be interpreted constitutional because of the principle that presume legislation to be constitutional. And the desirability of policy like this is not the subject of judical judgement but the subject of legislator. These things considered, installing National science and technology council under president and holding chairman of National science and technology council(NSTC) of president is not unconstitutional on the assumption the the revised bill must be improved. But questions remain about whether the act like this is desirable or nor in aspect of consitutional policy. Therefore National Assembly as the representative of policy must earnestly answer the question.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-300-002484080