메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
김구슬 (협성대)
저널정보
한국동서비교문학학회 동서비교문학저널 동서비교문학저널 제30호
발행연도
2014.6
수록면
21 - 44 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
T. S. Eliot has continually searched for the unity through his literary theory and practice in a world of contradiction and dissociation. This paper gives a critical examination of the nature of the poetics of unity that Eliot found in Dante, based on Eliot’s texts on Dante including “Dante” (1920), Dante (1929), “What Dante Means to me” (1950), “The Clark Lectures” (1926) and “The Turnbull Lectures” (1933). Unity, one of the characteristics of classicism refers to literary and philosophical monism in that feeling and thought, subject and object, matter and mind(soul) do not fall apart but are united in one, as set forth in F. H. Bradley’s ‘immediate experience’ on whose monistic epistemology Eliot wrote his doctorate dissertation, and the theories of the “sensibility of unification” and an “objective correlative.” The period during which Dante lived, as Eliot mentioned can be defined as that of unity in various respects. Furthermore Dante’s works also show the characteristics of the poetics of unity. The focus will be on presenting how the discussions of metaphysical and philosophical poetry, and allegory are closely connected with the themes of the poetics of unity, which will ultimately highlight the nature of Dante’s poetry and also that of Eliot’s poetic pursuit.

목차

Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (15)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-800-002468961